1982
DOI: 10.1109/edl.1982.25612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to "Comment on 'Magnetic transistor behavior explained by modulation of emitter injection, not carrier deflection'"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the given representation, many valuable results were obtained; however, such approach is not quite correct methodically. Thus, for example, the dominant effect in structures with the transverse axis is uncertain: there are weighty arguments for the deviation [21] and injection modulation effects [22]. The sensitivity of the same structure with the longitudinal axis [23] was explained in [1] by modulation of the transfer coefficient and in [2] by the deviation effect, but Mitnikova et al [23] considered it as a manifestation of the magnetic concentration effect.…”
Section: Continuity Equation and Mechanisms Of Horizontal Tms Sensitimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the given representation, many valuable results were obtained; however, such approach is not quite correct methodically. Thus, for example, the dominant effect in structures with the transverse axis is uncertain: there are weighty arguments for the deviation [21] and injection modulation effects [22]. The sensitivity of the same structure with the longitudinal axis [23] was explained in [1] by modulation of the transfer coefficient and in [2] by the deviation effect, but Mitnikova et al [23] considered it as a manifestation of the magnetic concentration effect.…”
Section: Continuity Equation and Mechanisms Of Horizontal Tms Sensitimentioning
confidence: 99%