1960
DOI: 10.2307/1419116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Changing Patterns of Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This negative recency effect, first reported by Jarvik (1951), has proved difficult to explain (Estes, 1964). However, two recent studies (Berks, 1963 ;Goodnow, Rubenstein, & Lubin, 1960) have demonstrated the importance of the average length of a run of events as a factor in any explanation of the negative recency effect. The Goodnow et al (1960) results showed that negative recency decreased as mean run length increased.…”
Section: University Of Massachusettsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This negative recency effect, first reported by Jarvik (1951), has proved difficult to explain (Estes, 1964). However, two recent studies (Berks, 1963 ;Goodnow, Rubenstein, & Lubin, 1960) have demonstrated the importance of the average length of a run of events as a factor in any explanation of the negative recency effect. The Goodnow et al (1960) results showed that negative recency decreased as mean run length increased.…”
Section: University Of Massachusettsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two recent studies (Berks, 1963 ;Goodnow, Rubenstein, & Lubin, 1960) have demonstrated the importance of the average length of a run of events as a factor in any explanation of the negative recency effect. The Goodnow et al (1960) results showed that negative recency decreased as mean run length increased. Berks (1963) found negative recency using short runs, and positive recency with long runs and extra long runs.…”
Section: University Of Massachusettsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators (Goodnow, Rubenstein, & Lubin, 1960;Jarvik, 1951;Restle, 1961) have emphasized the influence of the length of runs of homogeneous events on prediction behavior. Restle has presented a model which assumes both a random sequence and that Ss perform solely on the basis of runs of previous events.…”
Section: Results: Conditions 1-16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the discrepancy between the old and the new conditional reinforcement probabilities can affect RE in the opposite directions, depending on the amount of the discrepancy. There is, unfortunately, no literature concerning the transfer of learning of conditional probability, although there are some concerning that of unconditional probability of reinforcement (e.g., Goodnow, Lubin & Rubinstein 1960).…”
Section: Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%