2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response surface methodology calibration for DEM study of the impact of a spherical bit on a rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yan and other scholars [41][42][43][44][45] performed calibration on different materials using the DOE method, explored the impact of microscopic parameters on macroscopic parameters, and further proposed corresponding adjustment criteria. Deng Shuxin and other researchers [46][47][48][49][50] used the DOE method to calibrate a 3D model and they discovered insignificant deviations in the results. Peng and other researchers [51][52][53] believed that the Plackett-Burman(PB) design was insufficiently accurate and therefore developed various methods, such as spherical symmetry design and central composite design.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan and other scholars [41][42][43][44][45] performed calibration on different materials using the DOE method, explored the impact of microscopic parameters on macroscopic parameters, and further proposed corresponding adjustment criteria. Deng Shuxin and other researchers [46][47][48][49][50] used the DOE method to calibrate a 3D model and they discovered insignificant deviations in the results. Peng and other researchers [51][52][53] believed that the Plackett-Burman(PB) design was insufficiently accurate and therefore developed various methods, such as spherical symmetry design and central composite design.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan and other scholars 93 – 97 performed calibration on different materials using the DOE method, explored the impact of microscopic parameters on macroscopic parameters and further proposed corresponding adjustment criteria. Deng Shuxin and other researchers 56 , 98 – 101 used the DOE method to calibrate a 3D model and they discovered insignificant deviations in the results. Peng and other researchers 102 – 104 believed that the Plackett-Burman (PB) design was insufficiently accurate and therefore developed various methods, such as spherical symmetry design and central composite design.…”
Section: Review Of Calibration Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rock is granodiorite with macroscopic properties of density ρ = 2600 kg/m 3 , Y = 60 GPa, and ν = 0.22. The calibration procedure has been previously reported in [35]. The microparameters of the rock were calibrated using the response surface methodology and are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the calibration procedure was validated by comparing it to a finite element analysis. These findings, along with the detailed analysis, can be consulted in [35]. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the total mass and momentum of the drill bit are primarily concentrated in the spherical bit, which possesses a mass of 2.62 kg.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%