2018
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response surface and group additivity methodology for estimation of thermodynamic properties of organosilanes

Abstract: Group additivity methods simplify the determination of thermodynamic properties of a wide range of chemically related species involved in detailed reaction schemes. In this paper, we expand Benson's group additivity method to organosilanes. Based on quantum‐chemical calculations, the thermodynamic data of 22 stable silicon‐organic species are calculated, presented in the form of NASA polynomials, and compared to the available experimental data. Based on this theoretical database, a complete set of 24 Si‐ and C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
24
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
24
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier work, 17 we examined the enthalpy of formation of Si–C–H organosilane species using the atomization energy method. In it, the enthalpy of formation at 0 K is calculated as the difference between the theoretical atomization energy of a target species and the experimentally determined enthalpies of formation of the constituent atoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an earlier work, 17 we examined the enthalpy of formation of Si–C–H organosilane species using the atomization energy method. In it, the enthalpy of formation at 0 K is calculated as the difference between the theoretical atomization energy of a target species and the experimentally determined enthalpies of formation of the constituent atoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 In this method, group-additivity values (GAV) may be derived from experimental thermochemical data. Because experimental data can be scarce especially for certain reactive systems, the derivation of GAV often must rely on quantum chemical calculations (see, eg, Yamada et al, 15 Dellon et al, 16 and Janbazi et al 17 ). The benefit of the group-additivity method is that they are much easier to implement in codes for automatic mechanism generation, whereas it requires more programming effort to implement and more computational resources to conduct ab initio calculations for predicting thermochemical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, GAM requires the manual identification of substructures due to the detailed classification of chemical groups and substructures, thus it is not capable of automatic machine predicting when large quantities of compounds need to be marked. [25] In other words, the intelligent algorithms for molecular disassembly must be available before GAM being applied to computer programs, but to achieve these algorithms has been proved to be a challengeable work [31,[37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benson method has been widely used to estimate thermochemical properties such as enthalpy and Gibbs energy of formation and heat capacity, of different chemical compounds [16][17][18][19][20]. This methodology is based on hierarchy of additivities, starting from atomic, following by bond and finally the group additivity [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%