2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response stability of radial growth of Chinese pine to climate change at different altitudes on the southern edge of the Tengger Desert

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the difference in resilience or its components (resistance and recovery) due to a 30-m elevation difference in this paper was similar to that due to a 120–800-m elevation difference in other studies ( Wang et al., 2019 ; Bosela et al., 2020 ; Dell’Oro et al., 2020 ; Du et al., 2022 ). This means that there may be significant drought response differences even in the small-scale terrain, and the amount of difference in resilience-related indicators (recovery, resistance, or resilience) cannot be estimated only by the elevation difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the difference in resilience or its components (resistance and recovery) due to a 30-m elevation difference in this paper was similar to that due to a 120–800-m elevation difference in other studies ( Wang et al., 2019 ; Bosela et al., 2020 ; Dell’Oro et al., 2020 ; Du et al., 2022 ). This means that there may be significant drought response differences even in the small-scale terrain, and the amount of difference in resilience-related indicators (recovery, resistance, or resilience) cannot be estimated only by the elevation difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This means that there may be significant drought response differences even in the small-scale terrain, and the amount of difference in resilience-related indicators (recovery, resistance, or resilience) cannot be estimated only by the elevation difference. Other factors may also affect the response of tree growth to drought, thereby causing differences in resilience-related indicators of forests, such as the severity of drought in drought events ( Wang et al., 2019 ; Du et al., 2022 ), altitude range of forests ( Bose et al., 2020 ; Bosela et al., 2020 ), tree species ( Li et al., 2020 ), and tree age ( Wang et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The areas with a higher SI were mainly concentrated in the Bashang and high-altitude mountain areas, whereas the SI was low in low-altitude areas, for example, North China Plain. Temperature is the main climatic factor limiting the growth of trees at high altitudes, and the growth of low-altitude trees is mainly affected by precipitation ( Du et al., 2022 ). As future temperature increases, the limiting effect of low temperature on tree growth is augmented at high altitude ( Bai et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific objectives of this study were to (1) explore the main environmental factors affecting the larch SI; (2) simulate the larch SI under current and future climate scenarios in the study area; and (3) analyze the suitable growth areas of larch and the future change trend. Generally, temperature limits tree growth at high altitudes, whereas precipitation influences tree growth at low altitudes ( Du et al., 2022 ). Currently, larch is mainly distributed in Bashang Plateau and mountains, and with future climate change, larch tree species would migrate to higher latitudes ( Cheng et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%