1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00303547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of territorial male song sparrows to song types and variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, direct contact with the audience may not be necessary for the audience to be apparent. For example, chemical cues from another male induce changes in the courtship displays of male newts (Lissotriton boscai; Aragón, 2009), birds robustly respond to playbacks of conspecific vocalizations (Stoddard et al, 1991(Stoddard et al, , 1988, and humans behave more generously in an economic game when shown stylized visual cues of an observer (Haley and Fessler, 2005). In our experiments we replaced a male audience with male odor (urine or body odor), playbacks of male USVs or an anesthetized male (mixture of tactile and body odor cues) to test whether any of these cues are sufficient to produce an audience effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct contact with the audience may not be necessary for the audience to be apparent. For example, chemical cues from another male induce changes in the courtship displays of male newts (Lissotriton boscai; Aragón, 2009), birds robustly respond to playbacks of conspecific vocalizations (Stoddard et al, 1991(Stoddard et al, , 1988, and humans behave more generously in an economic game when shown stylized visual cues of an observer (Haley and Fessler, 2005). In our experiments we replaced a male audience with male odor (urine or body odor), playbacks of male USVs or an anesthetized male (mixture of tactile and body odor cues) to test whether any of these cues are sufficient to produce an audience effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in our lab we prefer the 150Hz filter for song birds such as Indigo Buntings and Song Sparrows (cf. Stoddard et al 1988). Moreover, the analysis argues against the natural tendency to use a "standard" setting across different species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases the test birds started responding 370 earlier, meaning that their first response cannot have been based on the repertoire size 371 broadcast. However, during the rest of the playback and in the period afterwards they 372 could have adjusted their response if the perceived threat was dependent on repertoire 373 size, as described by Stoddard et al (1988) for song sparrows. Nevertheless, even if the 374 test birds were able to distinguish between the two repertoire sizes, the magnitude of 375 response was similar during the broadcasting of both repertoire sizes.…”
Section: Statistical Analyses 264mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have tested 62 the direct response to different repertoire sizes, leading to ambiguous results. In a two 63 speaker experiment, male territorial field sparrows Spizella pusilla approached closer to 64 the speaker playing larger repertoires (Searcy 1983), and male song sparrows Melospiza4 melodia reacted more persistently to playback of larger repertoires (Stoddard et al 1988). 66 However, in other experiments -even one conducted with song sparrows -the reaction 67 of male birds did not vary in accordance with different repertoire sizes (song sparrow, 68 Searcy 1983; sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, Catchpole 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%