2017
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of synthetic diamond detectors in proton, carbon, and oxygen ion beams

Abstract: Due to the high LET value, a LET dependence of the response of the synthetic diamond detector was observed in the case of carbon and oxygen beams. The effect was found to be negligible in proton beams, due to the low LET value. The under-response of the synthetic diamond detector may result from the recombination of electron/hole in the thin synthetic diamond layer, due to the high LET-values. More investigations are required to confirm this assumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following beam monitor chamber calibration (see Section 2.E), absorbed doses were measured in a water phantom (PTW type 41023) at different depths along the SOBPs with the reference Advanced Markus chamber and compared with MC simulations in relative terms. The use of the PTW proton diode (type PR60020) or a micro‐diamond detector is foreseen for FSs below 1 cm (i.e., less than twice the sensitive area of the ionization chamber, as recommended in International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)‐398).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following beam monitor chamber calibration (see Section 2.E), absorbed doses were measured in a water phantom (PTW type 41023) at different depths along the SOBPs with the reference Advanced Markus chamber and compared with MC simulations in relative terms. The use of the PTW proton diode (type PR60020) or a micro‐diamond detector is foreseen for FSs below 1 cm (i.e., less than twice the sensitive area of the ionization chamber, as recommended in International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series (TRS)‐398).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These detectors appear to be dose rate independent, radiation hard, and exhibit limited LET dependence; in clinical protons beams and carbon ion beams no significant quenching effects can be observed. Only in low‐energy ion beams with very high LET in the Bragg peak minor quenching effects can be observed …”
Section: Detectors For Absorbed Dose In Nonreference Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in low-energy ion beams with very high LET in the Bragg peak minor quenching effects can be observed. 144,145…”
Section: E Solid-state Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detectors are commonly used in conjunction with a phantom for dosimetry measurements. Dosimeter function depends on properties such as linearity (the relationship between the dosimeter reading and dosimetric quantity), dose rate, energy dependence (the effect of different energies on the measurements), spatial resolution (the clarity of the dose map) and, in particle therapy, the energy transferred per unit length of the track – linear energy transfer [15]. A number of detectors have been well established in this field, summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: The Standardization Of Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%