2019
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and commissioning of the non‐dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron‐based CNAO facility

Abstract: Purpose: Only few centers worldwide treat intraocular tumors with proton therapy, all of them with a dedicated beamline, except in one case in the USA. The Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) is a synchrotron-based hadrontherapy facility equipped with fixed beamlines and pencil beam scanning modality. Recently, a general-purpose horizontal proton beamline was adapted to treat also ocular diseases. In this work, the conceptual design and main dosimetric properties of this new proton eye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
50
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the comparison of the results in the present study was extended to the data measured in water phantoms. The data for the bubble detectors placed inside a water tank irradiated with an energy range between 62.7 and 89.8 meV used for eye treatments (Ciocca et al 2019) suggest that H is about ten times lower than those obtained in the present study for a similar primary proton energy used for the lung treatment. Unexpectedly, for a brain tumor of 65 cm 3 volume located inside a paediatric phantom irradiated with proton PBS of energies in the range 70-140 meV (Knežević et al 2018), the H measured with track-etched detectors showed similar values as the ones simulated in the present study for the lung tumour with a target volume twice as large and much lower primary proton energy.…”
Section: Neutron Dose Equivalentcontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Hence, the comparison of the results in the present study was extended to the data measured in water phantoms. The data for the bubble detectors placed inside a water tank irradiated with an energy range between 62.7 and 89.8 meV used for eye treatments (Ciocca et al 2019) suggest that H is about ten times lower than those obtained in the present study for a similar primary proton energy used for the lung treatment. Unexpectedly, for a brain tumor of 65 cm 3 volume located inside a paediatric phantom irradiated with proton PBS of energies in the range 70-140 meV (Knežević et al 2018), the H measured with track-etched detectors showed similar values as the ones simulated in the present study for the lung tumour with a target volume twice as large and much lower primary proton energy.…”
Section: Neutron Dose Equivalentcontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The capability of the Giraffe device to measure depth-dose profiles and range values of ocular spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs) was tested. Collimated fields already delivered for real patients' ocular treatments were selected: those representing the only clinical case of very small field sizes (around 1.5 cm diameter), suitable for Giraffe tests (for the 2 SOBPs used see Table 1) at our facility [20]. The SOBPs used for ocular treatment are built with discrete energy levels, each corresponding to an isoenergetic slice (IES) with 1 mm water-equivalent step within the energy range (62.7 to 89.8 MeV) and a particular beamline configuration to shift the beam penetration at shallower depths.…”
Section: Ocular Proton Spread-out Bragg Peak Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Giraffe outputs were compared with the expected FLUKA Monte Carlo curves [20], performing the scoring within the same diameter as the sensitive volume of the detector. The Omni-Pro Incline software automatically retrieves the distal R 90 for the measured SOBP.…”
Section: Ocular Proton Spread-out Bragg Peak Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatments with patients in a lying posture are most commonly used in radiation therapy and there have been many reports of that clinical experience including setup accuracy and intra-fraction patient movement (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). On the other hand, there have been only a few studies that reported on the experience of radiation treatments using an upright posture, either with x ray or ion beams (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). To the best of our knowledge, beside a preliminary study of intra-faction movement in seated posture by films in 1980s (22), neither the clinical workflow nor the intra-fraction patient movement of the treatment with patients in an upright posture on a chair has been reported after the advent of image guidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%