2019
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2019.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of snowpack to +2°C global warming in Hokkaido, Japan

Abstract: The response of snowpack to a +2°C global warming relative to the present climate was estimated in Hokkaido, Japan, using a physical snowpack model driven by dynamically downscaled (DDS) data, after model evaluation. The evaluation revealed that the snowpack model successfully reproduced the height of snow cover (HS), snow water equivalent (SWE) and snow-covered days (SCDs), but had a moderate bias in the thickness ratios of melt form (MF) and hoar category (HC). The DDS-forced simulation predicted that the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the standard planting date was here set on May 1, the planting date was shifted to April 20, April 10, and April 1 for adaptation. This change of planting date is reasonable because the snow-covered days in Hokkaido is reduced by about 30 days under plus 2-K climate relative to the 1990s(Katsuyama et al 2019). However, the number of hot days from flowering to harvesting does not change much, if the planting date was shifted one month earlier in the 2K or 4K runs (Figs.7a,b; Histograms for April 20 and April 10 are not shown.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Whereas the standard planting date was here set on May 1, the planting date was shifted to April 20, April 10, and April 1 for adaptation. This change of planting date is reasonable because the snow-covered days in Hokkaido is reduced by about 30 days under plus 2-K climate relative to the 1990s(Katsuyama et al 2019). However, the number of hot days from flowering to harvesting does not change much, if the planting date was shifted one month earlier in the 2K or 4K runs (Figs.7a,b; Histograms for April 20 and April 10 are not shown.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where 𝑓 𝑠 = −7.5𝑇 + 93 and 𝑓 𝑟 = 46√7.2 − 𝑇 (Matsuo and Sasyo, 1981). The soil layers of the model were set to contain the 10 top layers of 10-cm thickness with mineral and organic soils evenly mixed, five middle layers of 20-cm thickness with mineral and organic soils evenly mixed, and a bottom layer of 8-m thickness with 100% mineral soil (Farouki, 1981;Katsuyama et al, 2020). The initial and bottom soil temperatures were given by the annual climatology of the air temperature plus 2.3°C (Hirota et al, 2002).…”
Section: Snowpack Model Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial and bottom soil temperatures were given by the annual climatology of the air temperature plus 2.3°C (Hirota et al, 2002). The above model configurations for the SNOWPACK model are suitable for a wide range of Japanese snowpacks (Katsuyama et al, 2020).…”
Section: Snowpack Model Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important point to be noted is a possible change in the agricultural calendar in response to climate change. For example, warmer winter may move up the snowmelt season and allow earlier spring seeding and planting in some crops (Katsuyama et al, 2020). Early seeding and planting can be an effective adaptive measure to global warming because it helps 1) decelerating the growth rate and guaranteeing the growth period under warmer conditions, and/or 2) avoiding growth retardation in hot summer caused by suppression of photosynthesis.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%