2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-018-0094-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of ground and rove beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae) to operational oil sands mine reclamation in northeastern Alberta, a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reclaimed upland habitats sampled are constructed landforms with a manufactured soil layer that is overlain with forest floor mineral mix or Peat Mineral Mix which is the overburden (soil layer) that was removed after initial vegetation clearing of the mine lease. This material was either stockpiled for later use or used to reclaim habitats via direct placement [18, 22, 63, 64]. While fire and logging are both associated with the removal or damage of existing vegetation, soil is left more or less intact, aiding in vegetative and wildlife recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The reclaimed upland habitats sampled are constructed landforms with a manufactured soil layer that is overlain with forest floor mineral mix or Peat Mineral Mix which is the overburden (soil layer) that was removed after initial vegetation clearing of the mine lease. This material was either stockpiled for later use or used to reclaim habitats via direct placement [18, 22, 63, 64]. While fire and logging are both associated with the removal or damage of existing vegetation, soil is left more or less intact, aiding in vegetative and wildlife recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLR plots represent an interesting source of disturbance, having had all their vegetation removed (not just harvestable timber), however, the soil is left mostly intact. Interestingly, younger CLR plots (5–11 years) clustered both with MF plots and with older REC plots, perhaps suggesting that CLR plots are also recovering more quickly than REC plots, likely due to minimal disturbance of the soil [18, 22, 63, 64]. COMP plots, on the other hand, cluster with REC plots of similar age (Fig 3d), potentially as COMP plots have had their soil characteristics reconstructed, therefore exhibiting a disturbance regime similar to that of REC plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations