2019
DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2019v40a10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Bryophytes to Disturbances in Managed Forests. A Case Study from a Polish Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we assume that biocrust growth in our study area was limited by leaf litter fall rather than suppression by vascular plants. A negative effect of leaf litter was also reported in several other studies (Wu et al, 2020;Alatalo et al, 2020;Márialigeti et al, 2009;Fojcik et al, 2019;Mercier et al, 2019).…”
Section: Biocrust and Total Vegetation Coveragesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, we assume that biocrust growth in our study area was limited by leaf litter fall rather than suppression by vascular plants. A negative effect of leaf litter was also reported in several other studies (Wu et al, 2020;Alatalo et al, 2020;Márialigeti et al, 2009;Fojcik et al, 2019;Mercier et al, 2019).…”
Section: Biocrust and Total Vegetation Coveragesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, Rola et al (2021) showed that soils with a more acidic pH promoted a larger bryophyte coverage, which 285 could explain, among other things, the generally higher bryophyte cover in CT in our study. even with high total vegetation cover, which contradicts observations that vascular plants limit biocrust growth in different ecosystems (Corbin and Thiet, 2020;Bergamini et al, 2001;Fojcik et al, 2019). Ingerpuu et al (2005) verified in a grassland experiment that vascular plants could actually facilitate moss growth, explaining this by the fact that vascular plants create a more favourable microclimate under their canopy.…”
Section: Biocrust and Total Vegetation Coveragementioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, most studies concerned grassland communities in which the herbaceous plant layer is, as a rule, significantly more developed than in the temperate forests. As regards forests, Fojcik et al (2019) also revealed the negative impact of herbaceous plants on the total coverage of bryophytes in a managed temperate mixed forest in Poland. Similarly, Turkington et al (1998) showed that the addition of NPK fertilizer to a nutrient-poor boreal forest ecosystem resulted in an intensive growth of vascular plants, mainly grasses, which at the same time caused a decrease in bryophyte cover.…”
Section: Interaction Between Ground Bryophytes and Understory Vascular Plant Layermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ignatov & Huttunen), which results in a greater diversity of bryoflora (Mazimpaka & Lara 1995;Mežaka & Znotiņa, 2006;Márialigeti et al, 2009). Lophocolea heterophylla was found most often on the pine trunk bases; Pundiak & Grodzki (2017) and Fojcik et al (2019) also mention such a preference of this liverwort on epiphytic habitats. The occurrence of bryophytes on the trunk bases is also an advantage due to the higher humidity compared to the higher parts of a tree (Mazimpaka & Lara 1995;Pundiak & Grodzki, 2017), as well as a higher degree of bark cracking (Ranius et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%