1993
DOI: 10.1299/kikaib.59.721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of an Axisynmetric Separation Bubble to Sinusoidal Forcing. Effects of Forcing Frequency, Forcing Level and Reynolds Number.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 presents the evolution of L * R with respect to St A . Results are in good agreement with previous observations [17,19,22]. Indeed, L * R decreases strongly at low actuation frequencies, reaching a minimum L * R,min ≈ 1.5 (i.e.…”
Section: Flow Forcing and Its Effects On Scalingsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 5 presents the evolution of L * R with respect to St A . Results are in good agreement with previous observations [17,19,22]. Indeed, L * R decreases strongly at low actuation frequencies, reaching a minimum L * R,min ≈ 1.5 (i.e.…”
Section: Flow Forcing and Its Effects On Scalingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Among these methods, those based on a periodic forcing have received particular attention, because of their ability to interact with the instabilities of the separated shear layer. A large corpus of experimental works [17][18][19][20][21] as well as numerical studies [4] has shown that periodic actuators can be more or less effective at modifying the shape of the separation, depending on how the frequency of the forcing compares to the characteristic frequency of the natural convective instability. With respect to this natural threshold, low actuation frequencies generally create a train of coherent counterotating vortices [22], which enhances the growth of the separated shear layer and reduces L R [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%