2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0021364020100094
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a SINIS Detector with Electron Cooling to Submillimeter-Wave Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in [30], and shown in Figure 3, at voltages below the superconducting gap, the electron temperature T e at the substrate temperature T∼0.1 K is ∼0.23 K due to overheating caused by spurious radiation. At the substrate temperature T∼0.3 K, the electron temperature is close to the substrate temperature T e ≈ T. In both cases, with an increase in bias voltage, T e decreases due to electron cooling and reaches 0.19 K at a voltage corresponding to the maximum response.…”
Section: Electron Coolingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As mentioned in [30], and shown in Figure 3, at voltages below the superconducting gap, the electron temperature T e at the substrate temperature T∼0.1 K is ∼0.23 K due to overheating caused by spurious radiation. At the substrate temperature T∼0.3 K, the electron temperature is close to the substrate temperature T e ≈ T. In both cases, with an increase in bias voltage, T e decreases due to electron cooling and reaches 0.19 K at a voltage corresponding to the maximum response.…”
Section: Electron Coolingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…𝑃 𝐾 = ξ 𝑠(𝑇 𝑝ℎ 4 − 𝑇 4 ), ( 6) where ξ=360 nW/μm 2 K 4 , s is the contact area of the normal electrode with the substrate. This correction in all cases did not exceed 1-2%.…”
Section: W II Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under stationary conditions and the assumption that a Fermi distribution is established in the system of electrons, the absorbed power can be calculated using the formula for the electron -phonon interaction. In the classic work [3], as well as in [2] and in our earlier paper [4] the following expression was used 𝑃 5 = 𝑃 𝑒−𝑝ℎ = Σ𝑣(𝑇 𝑒 5 -𝑇 𝑝ℎ 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low resistances of NIS junctions and strong electron cooling, excited electrons are effectively removed from the absorber, their multiplication does not occur, and the current response decreases from dI/dP=e/kT down to dI/dP=e/hf in the case of the so-called cold electron bolometer CEB. The role of electron cooling on the response of SINIS detectors was experimentally investigated in [18], where it was shown that electron cooling does not provide the same sensitivity as the cooling of the receiver as a whole. Current quantum response efficiency for bolometer integrated in a twin-slot antenna [8] is in the range of 0.52-1.1 for signal power 4.8-0.11 pW.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 99%