2011
DOI: 10.1080/1034912x.2011.547343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Inhibition and its Relationship to Phonological Processing in Children with and without Dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the study of van der Schoot et al (2000) revealed a behavioral inhibition deficit on a letter version of the Stop-signal task in children with RD, and Schmid et al (2011) did not find any differences between the control children and children with RD on a picture version of this task. However, in contrast with our findings and those of e.g., Schmid et al (2011), a study of de Jong et al (2009) revealed significant deficits on a picture version of the stop signal task. These mixed results may partly be explained by the task impurity problem (Miyake et al, 2000).…”
Section: Modality-specific and Alphanumeric Versus Domain-general Errcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the study of van der Schoot et al (2000) revealed a behavioral inhibition deficit on a letter version of the Stop-signal task in children with RD, and Schmid et al (2011) did not find any differences between the control children and children with RD on a picture version of this task. However, in contrast with our findings and those of e.g., Schmid et al (2011), a study of de Jong et al (2009) revealed significant deficits on a picture version of the stop signal task. These mixed results may partly be explained by the task impurity problem (Miyake et al, 2000).…”
Section: Modality-specific and Alphanumeric Versus Domain-general Errcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Research of de Jong et al (2009) and Purvis and Tannock (2000) revealed that children with RD had an impaired stop signal reaction time in comparison to control children. However, other studies found no differences between both groups (e.g., Reiter, Tucha, & Lange, 2005;Schmid et al, 2011). For instance, Van De Voorde, Roeyers, Verte, and Wiersema (2010) found no behavioral inhibition problems, as measured by a Go/no-go task, in RD when a baseline measure of functioning was taken into account.…”
Section: Behavioral Inhibition In Children With Reading Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O teste mais utilizado, entre os estudos para avaliar a MT é o Digit Span ou Dígitos (BROSNAN et al, 2002;REITER;TUCHA;LANGE, 2005;SCHMID;LABUHN;HASSELHORN, 2011;CIASCA, 2013;CRUZ-RODRIGUES et al, 2014).…”
Section: Memória De Trabalhounclassified
“…Inhibitory control is considered to be one of the key components of school readiness and school achievement (McClelland & Cameron, 2011;Molfese, Molfese, Molfese, Rudasill, Armstrong, & Starkey, 2010) and it was proved to be a good predictor of efficacy in reading and writing acquisition (Altemeier, Abbott, & Berninger, 2008;Schmid, Labuhn, & Hasselhorn, 2011). Some authors suggest that the importance of inhibitory control varies depending on the stage of reading and writing ability development (Christopher, Miyake, Keenan, Pennington, DeFries, Wadsworth, Willcutt, & Olson, 2012;see also: Jabłoński, 2013).…”
Section: Developmental Patterns Of the Relations Between Inhibitory Cmentioning
confidence: 99%