Response inhibition and interference control in patients with bipolar I disorder and first‐degree relatives

Hıdıroğlu, Ceren; Torres, Ivan J.; Er, Ayşe; Işık, Gizem; Yalın, Nefize; Yatham, Lakshmi N.; Ceylan, Deniz; Özerdem, Ayşegül

doi:10.1111/bdi.12335

Cited by 24 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, EBP exhibited widespread deficits across the six neurocognitive domains according to the version of MCCB adapted to the ISBD recommendations. Alongside this, other studies that have used both the MCCB battery and other neurocognitive batteries showed that EBP present a neurocognitive deficit that affects multiple neurocognitive domains. It is noteworthy that Burdick et al used the standard MCCB and found differences between EBP and controls in all neurocognitive domains except for problem solving.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Emotion processing and psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolar disorder

Aparicio

Santos

Jiménez‐López

et al. 2017

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Emotion processing and psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolar disorder

Aparicio

Santos

Jiménez‐López

et al. 2017

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A major field of research in addictive disorders endeavours to identify distinctive neurobehavioral endophenotypes that predispose individuals to compulsive drug use. Evidences coming from other fields suggests that response inhibition and inhibitory control might be heritable [ 45 – 47 ]. In smoking behaviours, recent data suggest that cognitive deficits in inhibitory control are present before starting the use of tobacco.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Executive Functions in Tobacco Dependence: Importance of Inhibitory Capacities

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundExecutive functions are linked to tobacco dependence and craving. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the impact of three executive functions: updating, inhibition and shifting processes on tobacco craving and dependence.Method134 tobacco consumers were included in this study: 81 moderately (Fagerström score <7) and 53 heavily dependent (Fagerström score >7). Dependence was assessed with the Fagerström test and craving with the tobacco craving questionnaire (TCQ 12). We used the Stroop test and the Hayling test to measure inhibition, the Trail Making Test to measure shifting processes and the n-back test to measure updating processes. A multivariate logistic model was used to assess which variables explained best the level of nicotine dependence.ResultsInhibition (p = 0.002) and updating (p = 0.014) processes, but not shifting processes, were associated with higher tobacco dependence. Inhibition capacity had a significant effect on the nicotine dependence level independently of age, education, time since last cigarette, intellectual quotient, craving, updating and shifting process.ConclusionsNicotine dependence level seems better explained by inhibition capacities than by craving and updating effects. The capacity to inhibit our behaviours is a good predictor of the severity of tobacco dependence. Our results suggest a prefrontal cortex dysfunction affecting the inhibitory capacities of heavy tobacco dependent smokers. Further studies are needed to investigate the application of these findings in the treatment of tobacco dependence.

show abstract

“…Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with neurocognitive impairment which persists in remission phase of the illness [1,2]. Meta-analytical studies in remitted BD found deficits with medium to large effect sizes (Cohen d = 0.5–0.8) in a number of cognitive domains, including executive functions, processing speed, sustained attention and verbal memory [1,3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%