2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response and Resistance to Trametinib in MAP2K1-Mutant Triple-Negative Melanoma

Abstract: The development of targeted therapies for non-BRAF p.Val600-mutant melanomas remains a challenge. Triple wildtype (TWT) melanomas that lack mutations in BRAF, NRAS, or NF1 form 10% of human melanomas and are heterogeneous in their genomic drivers. MAP2K1 mutations are enriched in BRAF-mutant melanoma and function as an innate or adaptive resistance mechanism to BRAF inhibition. Here we report the case of a patient with TWT melanoma with a bona fide MAP2K1 mutation without any BRAF mutations. We performed a str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small cohort of cases demonstrated mutations in multiple TCGA driver genes (n = 20, 7.9%), and within this subset, a majority harbored mutations in NF1 as well as either BRAF or NRAS (n = 18 of 20, 90%) (Figure 1a). In addition to TCGA driver genes (BRAF, NRAS, NF1), we evaluated recurrent molecular alterations observed in at least 5% of the entire cohort, the majority of which were established oncogenes or tumor suppressors (Figure 1b) [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Recurrently altered genes included 13), PTPRB (n = 13 or 5%), PREX2 (n = 13 or 5%), and SETD2 (n = 13 or 5%).…”
Section: Molecular Melanoma Groups Display Characteristic Phenotypic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small cohort of cases demonstrated mutations in multiple TCGA driver genes (n = 20, 7.9%), and within this subset, a majority harbored mutations in NF1 as well as either BRAF or NRAS (n = 18 of 20, 90%) (Figure 1a). In addition to TCGA driver genes (BRAF, NRAS, NF1), we evaluated recurrent molecular alterations observed in at least 5% of the entire cohort, the majority of which were established oncogenes or tumor suppressors (Figure 1b) [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Recurrently altered genes included 13), PTPRB (n = 13 or 5%), PREX2 (n = 13 or 5%), and SETD2 (n = 13 or 5%).…”
Section: Molecular Melanoma Groups Display Characteristic Phenotypic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to TCGA driver genes (BRAF, NRAS, NF1), we evaluated recurrent molecular alterations observed in at least 5% of the entire cohort, the majority of which were established oncogenes or tumor suppressors (Figure 1b) [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] NRAS mutations were predominantly Q61 variants regardless of whether the tumors were in the NRAS driver (n = 67/77 or 86%) or co-mutated group (n = 9/14 or 64.3%) (Figure 2b). A total of 67 putative loss of function variants in NF1 were identified, with the majority clustered at the 5 ′ end of the gene, suggesting that the upstream loss of function mutations is enriched in NF1 (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Braf Nras and Nf1 Mutant Melanomas Exhibit Distinct Alterati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to TCGA driver genes (BRAF, NRAS, NF1), we evaluated recurrent molecular alterations observed in at least 5% of the entire cohort, the majority of which are established oncogenes or tumor suppressors (Figure 1b). [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Recurrently altered genes included TERT (n=216), CDKN2A/B (n=116) TP53 (n=93),…”
Section: Molecular Melanoma Groups Display Characteristic Phenotypic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%