1986
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory release of CO2 in alfalfa and soybean under field conditions☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this growth stage, essentially all the incoming radiation is intercepted by the canopy and the only difference between their approach and ours is that we included soil fauna and flora respiration in our calculations. However, very low soil respiration rates (0.034 mg m-2 s-1 ) were measured during that experiment ( da Costa et al, 1986). The small difference between 3.1 g C02 Mr 1 PAR reported by Baldocchi et al (1981) and the slope measured for LAI > 1 in our experiment (2.87 to 3.44 g C0 2 MJ-1 IPAR) sug- :j: Based on the sampling of 20 plants and expressed per meter square of ground by multiplying by averaged plant density (42 plants m-2 ).…”
Section: Radiation Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…At this growth stage, essentially all the incoming radiation is intercepted by the canopy and the only difference between their approach and ours is that we included soil fauna and flora respiration in our calculations. However, very low soil respiration rates (0.034 mg m-2 s-1 ) were measured during that experiment ( da Costa et al, 1986). The small difference between 3.1 g C02 Mr 1 PAR reported by Baldocchi et al (1981) and the slope measured for LAI > 1 in our experiment (2.87 to 3.44 g C0 2 MJ-1 IPAR) sug- :j: Based on the sampling of 20 plants and expressed per meter square of ground by multiplying by averaged plant density (42 plants m-2 ).…”
Section: Radiation Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is also important to note that at times, particularly in the late afternoon, isotope-partitioned R eco dropped below R soil which is unexpected. Above-ground autotrophic respiration in agricultural systems typically ranges between 37-62% of total R eco (Suleau et al, 2011) and was previously measured to be 35% of total R eco in alfalfa (Da Costa et al, 1986). Therefore, we would expect the ratio of R soil :R eco to vary across ecosystems with a general trend that R soil underestimates R eco (Janssens et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the basis of growing season data, soil respiration is the dominant component of ecosystem respiration in the successional field ( Figure 6), and we demonstrate enhancement of ecosystem respiration under warm and wet conditions. It is possible (though not determined by these results) that in addition to contributing directly to NEP through CO 2 assimilation, early successional vegetation may indirectly offset NEP by reducing soil temperature (shading) and soil , 1986, and 1920(J. Wang and H. Epstein, unpublished data, 2005, suggesting interplay between vegetation and controls on ecosystem respiration.…”
Section: Comparing Tower-based and Ground-based Carbon Fluxmentioning
confidence: 91%