2014 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccsp.2014.6949996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory rate, heart rate and continuous measurement of BP using PPG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the published results, the achieved mean error for the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimation is 5.1 ± 4.3 mmHg, and 4.6 ± 4.3 mmHg, respectively, in a case study that encompasses 78 PPG records and matching SBP and DBP values [ 81 ]; an error of ±4.76 mmHg for DBP, ±4.23 mmHg for the mean arterial pressure (MAP), and ±5.93 mmHg for SBP is achieved in a pilot study of 150 recordings from 10 subjects [ 27 ]; 9 ± 5.6 mmHg for SBP and 1.8 ± 1.3 mmHg for DBP is obtained from a method that uses Ballistocardiography (BCG) and PPG signals [ 82 ]; 0.8 ± 7 mmHg for SBP and 0.9 ± 6 mmHg for DBP by using PPG signals [ 83 ]; accuracy results of 7.487 ± 8.824 mmHg (mean ± SD) for SBP and 4.076 ± 5.617 mmHg (mean ± SD) for DBP from a PTT-based study [ 26 ]; and a similar PTT-based method tested on 300 datasets from six subjects provides a SD of 6.492 mmHg [ 84 ]. Table 11 presents a comparison of the results reported in this paper with the results reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the published results, the achieved mean error for the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimation is 5.1 ± 4.3 mmHg, and 4.6 ± 4.3 mmHg, respectively, in a case study that encompasses 78 PPG records and matching SBP and DBP values [ 81 ]; an error of ±4.76 mmHg for DBP, ±4.23 mmHg for the mean arterial pressure (MAP), and ±5.93 mmHg for SBP is achieved in a pilot study of 150 recordings from 10 subjects [ 27 ]; 9 ± 5.6 mmHg for SBP and 1.8 ± 1.3 mmHg for DBP is obtained from a method that uses Ballistocardiography (BCG) and PPG signals [ 82 ]; 0.8 ± 7 mmHg for SBP and 0.9 ± 6 mmHg for DBP by using PPG signals [ 83 ]; accuracy results of 7.487 ± 8.824 mmHg (mean ± SD) for SBP and 4.076 ± 5.617 mmHg (mean ± SD) for DBP from a PTT-based study [ 26 ]; and a similar PTT-based method tested on 300 datasets from six subjects provides a SD of 6.492 mmHg [ 84 ]. Table 11 presents a comparison of the results reported in this paper with the results reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally, PTT is calculated from the time distance between R wave of ECG signal and following peak of fingertip PPG signal [10]. PTT based methods [5]- [7], [11]- [13] have been demonstrated to achieve relatively high accuracy on BP estimation, but two devices are required for the measurement. This is inconvenient and requires high operation skill in practical usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that Manuscript received August 4, 2016; revised December 9, 2016 cuff-less, noninvasive, and continuous measurement of BP could be achieved by photoplethysmography (PPG) [1]- [7]. PPG [8] is a simple, portable and low-cost optical pulse that can be used to detect blood volume changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Types of PPG sensor [11] The PPG sensor provides the change in the voltage level according to the change in the blood flow and thus the PPG signal in voltage values can be obtained from it. This signal can be easily acquired and plotted to calculate the heart rate and various other parameters.…”
Section: Photoplethysmographymentioning
confidence: 99%