Respiratory Protection Considerations for Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a surge of patients that exceeds available human and physical resources in many settings, triggering the implementation of crisis standards of care. High-quality respiratory protection is essential to reduce exposure among healthcare workers, yet dire shortages of personal protective equipment in the United States threaten the health and safety of this essential workforce. In the context of rapidly changing conditions and incomplete data, this article outlines 3 important strategies to improve healthcare workers' respiratory protection. At a minimum, healthcare workers delivering care to patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 should wear N95 respirators and full-face shields. Several mechanisms exist to boost and protect the supply of N95 respirators, including rigorous decontamination protocols, invoking the Defense Production Act, expanded use of reusable elastomeric respirators, and repurposing industrial N95 respirators. Finally, homemade facial coverings do not protect healthcare workers and should be avoided. These strategies, coupled with longer-term strategies of investments in protective equipment research, infrastructure, and data systems, provide a framework to protect healthcare workers immediately and enhance preparedness efforts for future pandemics.

Effectiveness and Recommendations for the Use of Dental Masks in the Prevention of COVID-19: A Literature Review

“…24 Different decontamination strategies, such as sterilization by exposure to ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, or vaporized hydrogen peroxide, have been shown to be effective in maintaining adequate protective function. 30,[33][34][35][36] In 1 study, different common sterilization methods for masks were performed including heat treatment, cabinet UVGI sterilizer, steam, alcohol solutions, and chlorine-based solutions. The last 2 methods caused degradation of the static charge required by the FFR.…”

Predicting the Impact of COVID-19 and the Potential Impact of the Public Health Response on Disease Burden in Uganda

“…Clinicians and direct care givers of COVID-19 patients have a disproportionately higher mortality than the general age-adjusted population. 9 Closure of logistics-related workplaces and transport services interrupts supply lines. 10 Travel bans and reduction in public transportation limit access, and public perceptions of increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection near health facilities dissuade attendance, whereas clinic activities considered "non-urgent," such as antenatal care, may be postponed.…”

Equipo de protección personal y COVID-19

“…Cir Gen. 2020; 42(2): 116-123. doi: 10.35366/95370 IntRoduCCIón E l concepto de equipo de protección personal (EPP) para el médico tiene una historia muy antigua; los objetivos de proteger tanto al médico como al paciente en el contexto actual en el que la OMS (Organización Mundial de la Salud) declaró a partir del 11 de marzo a la enfermedad COVID-19 como pandémica, los trabajadores de la salud están en alto riesgo de contagio, estimándose entre 4.4 y 20% de los enfermos. 1 El nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 se identificó en diciembre en la provincia de Wuhan, China. Es un virus ARN con apariencia de corona.…”