Resource-richness, technological innovation, and sustainable development: Evidence from emerging economies

Liu, Qiang; Sun, Hao; Luo, Huai‐Rong

doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103047

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The practical results of using the declared model confirmed the increase in the availability of natural resources in developing countries. However, the authors note that these resources significantly threaten ecological quality [14].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global measurement of ecological footprint in the context of sustainable development

Kovshun,

Doroshenko,

Zhydyk

et al. 2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relationships between the ecological footprint indicator and the level of achievement of sustainable development goals at the global level were examined. Cluster analysis tools were used to assess such relationships by grouping countries with similar characteristics according to these two indicators. As a consequence, four clusters of countries were identified. The first cluster, which mainly includes African countries, is characterized by a low level of economic development and a minimal impact on the environment. It was determined that the second cluster includes many countries of the European Union, Argentina, Brazil, Cuba and Chile and it’s characterized by a high level of achievement of sustainable development goals and a moderate impact on nature. The third cluster, which includes India, Egypt, Indonesia and other countries, has a low ecological footprint, indicating conservation of natural resources and an average level of achievement of sustainable development goals. These countries have the potential for harmonious social, ecological and economic development. It was established that the countries of the fourth cluster have achieved a significant level of sustainable development, but they use large amounts of natural resources. It was found that the common directions of environmental policy for SDG achievement of are the fight against pollution, resource exhaustion and climate change to avoid a decrease in quality of of life of citizens.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global measurement of ecological footprint in the context of sustainable development

Kovshun,

Doroshenko,

Zhydyk

et al. 2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some studies have explored the coupling relationship between the digital economy and the ecological environment (Fu et al, 2022;Han et al, 2023;Li et al, 2023;Zhang and Zhao, 2023). Other studies have examined the impact of the digital economy on ecological performance (Shen et al, 2022), ecological resilience (Dong, 2023), and the ecological footprint (Dai et al, 2023). Other studies have con rmed that the digital economy can reduce environmental pollution (Bai et al, 2022;Wan and Shi, 2022;Xu et al, 2022;Guo et al, 2023;Liu, 2023), industrial pollution , air pollution (Wang and Ding, 2023;Wu et al, 2023;Zhang and Ran, 2023), and haze pollution (Zhou et al, 2021;Che and Wang, 2022;Sun et al, 2022;Zhao et al, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does digital technology promote ecological civilization construction?Evidence from China

chang

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the rapid growth of digital technology, understanding its impact on ecological civilization construction (ECC) is essential. This study measures the level of digital technology and ECC in 31 provinces of China, from 2011 to 2022. Using a two-way fixed effect model, threshold effect model, and spatial spillover effect model, this study explores the impact of digital technology on ECC. The main research conclusions include: (1) Digital technology can significantly promote ECC. After robustness and endogeneity tests, this conclusion still holds. (2) Regional heterogeneity exists in the promotion effect of digital technology on ECC, manifested as western > central > eastern. (3) The promotion effect of digital technology on ECC is non-linear. When the level of digital technology exceeds a certain threshold, its promotion effect on ECC will be weakened. (4) Digital technology not only promotes ECC in the studied locality but also has a positive spatial spillover effect on ECC in adjacent geographical regions. Based on the above research conclusions, this study identifies some policy implications.

show abstract

“…The research showed that the level of sustainable development in the Yangtze River Delta region is constantly improving and the level of sustainable development of cities is spatially unbalanced [15]. In addition, Liu et al (2022) used regional data to find that technological innovation is an important factor affecting sustainable development and used natural resources to invest in technology to promote sustainable development [16]. Regarding industry, Ching et al (2022) conducted a systematic literature review and identified 15 sustainability functions of Industry 4.0 for sustainable manufacturing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Green Investment on China’s Sustainable Development

Wang

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promoting green investment and green industry development is necessary to transform from the traditional crude economic model to a high-quality and high-efficiency economic model. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2007 to 2021, this paper uses the entropy method to measure the level of sustainable development, examines the direct and spillover effects of green investment on the level of sustainable development in China through the spatial Durbin model, explores the heterogeneous characteristics of the spatial effects, and reveals the specific path of green investment to promote sustainable development in China. The level of sustainable development in China has an apparent spatial correlation: green investment can simultaneously improve the level of sustainable development in the region and nearby regions, has a prominent intermediary role in promoting the level of sustainable development in the region, has apparent heterogeneity in promoting the level of sustainable development in China, and, in the east and regions with high urbanization rates, green investment has apparent spillover effects on the level of sustainable development. There is a significant heterogeneity of green investment in promoting sustainable development in China, with green investment in eastern and highly urbanized regions having a significant spillover effect on sustainable development, i.e., green investment in eastern and highly urbanized regions can significantly promote the development of sustainable levels in neighboring regions. Recommendations: Eastern regions and regions with high urbanization rates should actively make use of their resources, location, and technological advantages to enhance the spatial spillover effect of sustainable development to lead the development of the region, gradually form a regional collaborative development trend, and drive overall sustainable development.

show abstract

Resource-richness, technological innovation, and sustainable development: Evidence from emerging economies

Cited by 11 publications

References 39 publications

Global measurement of ecological footprint in the context of sustainable development

Global measurement of ecological footprint in the context of sustainable development

Does digital technology promote ecological civilization construction?Evidence from China

Influence of Green Investment on China’s Sustainable Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About