1989
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15094.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Limitation and Offspring Size and Number Trade‐offs in Cirsium Arvense (Asteraceae)

Abstract: We employed high and low pollination treatments to examine the effect of varying offspring number on the allocation of resources to individual seeds in 5 female clones of the dioecious perennial, Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.). In comparison to high pollination plants, low pollination plants displayed a significantly reduced seed set, an unchanged rate of seed abortion, a significant increase in mean achene weight, and an altered pattern of achene weight allocation across primary, secondary, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically., in reference to the current experiment, none of these traits (ovule size, ovule number, or anther size) exhibited a sigtiificant treatment effect or sex x trt-ntment interaction (table 1), suggesting that these are genetically fixed trade-offs. The observed ovule size-number trade-off indicated by our results is consistent with progeny size-number trade-offs predicted under life-history theory hut is rarely reported by empirical studies (Greenway and Harder 2Ü07), although some studies have shown a negative correlation between seed size and ovule number (Lalonde and Roitberg 1989;Lehtilä and Ehrlén 2005). Not surprisingly, females do not seem to experience a trade-off between anther and ovule production, as would be expected given that females derive fitness exclusively through female function and have presumably experienced (and apparently responded to) past selectioti to minimize allocation to vestigial stamens.…”
Section: Discussion Isupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically., in reference to the current experiment, none of these traits (ovule size, ovule number, or anther size) exhibited a sigtiificant treatment effect or sex x trt-ntment interaction (table 1), suggesting that these are genetically fixed trade-offs. The observed ovule size-number trade-off indicated by our results is consistent with progeny size-number trade-offs predicted under life-history theory hut is rarely reported by empirical studies (Greenway and Harder 2Ü07), although some studies have shown a negative correlation between seed size and ovule number (Lalonde and Roitberg 1989;Lehtilä and Ehrlén 2005). Not surprisingly, females do not seem to experience a trade-off between anther and ovule production, as would be expected given that females derive fitness exclusively through female function and have presumably experienced (and apparently responded to) past selectioti to minimize allocation to vestigial stamens.…”
Section: Discussion Isupporting
confidence: 92%
“…BG plants originating in an environment intermediate between SB and AM with respect to productivity and unpredictability, are between these two extremes, and two-directional gene flow may have additional smoothing effect to the effect of natural selection. A negative correlation between seed mass and number has been documented in several studies comparing small-seeded versus large-seeded species (Shipley and Dion 1992;Greene and Johnson 1994;Turnbull et al 1999;Eriksson 2000, 2003), as well as within several species (van Groenendael 1985;Lalonde and Roitberg 1989;McGinley 1989). However, our study describes the dynamics of this relationship across an aridity gradient as a part of plant strategies.…”
Section: Seed Size and Numbermentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This has been demonstrated for a number of species from different taxa and trophic levels, e.g. Blue Tits Parus caeruleus (Dhondt, Kempenaers & Adriaensen 1992), Thistle Cirsium arvense (Lalonde & Roitberg 1989), Deep-water Prawn Pandalus borealis (Clarke, Hopkins & Nilssen 1991), Fruit-flies (Stearns 1992) and a cladoceran, Simocephalus vetulus (Perrin 1988(Perrin , 1989. In fishes, several studies have documented that food supply influences egg size and fecundity but the effect seems to vary among species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%