2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2166-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium from leaves of lucerne stands of different ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
51
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
11
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is inconsistent with the findings of Yang and Luo (2011), who reported that leaf C:N and C:P ratios increased with stand age [13]. A previous study indicated that the leaf N:P ratios in lucerne decreased and then increased with stand age [14]; consistent with our findings. However, the correlation between leaf N:P ratio and stand age varied by sampling month and sampling year.…”
Section: Correlation Studycontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern is inconsistent with the findings of Yang and Luo (2011), who reported that leaf C:N and C:P ratios increased with stand age [13]. A previous study indicated that the leaf N:P ratios in lucerne decreased and then increased with stand age [14]; consistent with our findings. However, the correlation between leaf N:P ratio and stand age varied by sampling month and sampling year.…”
Section: Correlation Studycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, decreases in leaf N and P concentrations with growth may be caused by the re-allocation of nutrient elements to other organs in the late growing season. The results of this study indicate that leaf N and P concentrations were more easily influenced than was C concentration by growing season, sampling year and stand age, which is consistent with the results of other reports [14,15,25]. Across all of the larch stands, large variations in leaf C, N and P concentrations were observed, and the leaves of saplings displayed greater demand for N and P than did the other stands.…”
Section: Patterns Of the Leaf C N And P Concentrations Across All Disupporting
confidence: 90%
“…No significant difference was found between this study and previous report (Wang et al, 2014) and between lucerne and other species from larger scales (Elser et al, 2000;He et al, 2008;McGroddy et al, 2004;Reich and Oleksyn, 2004;Townsend et al, 2007;Zheng and Shangguan, 2007). This result differs a lot from what we knew from a semi-arid grassland of China (Cui et al, 2010), in which the legume shrub showed the highest foliar N:P. However, in most cases lucerne leaf N:P was higher than the global values, possibly resulting from the very high Volume 39 Issue 4 (2016) 599 N concentration of leguminous lucerne with strong BNF.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Cut effect was significant on total N:P concentration. There was a significant effect of age on leaf total P concentration, in accordance with Wang et al (2014). These cut and age effects are mostly from the change in N concentration since there was a stronger correlation of N:P with N than P. Additionally, N:P in leaves was greater than in stems due to more N accumulation in the leaf.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation