2010
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Résorption foliaire chez Quercus petraea subsp. iberica et Arbutus andrachne le long d’un gradient altitudinal

Abstract: Abstract• The resorption of nutrients (mainly N and P) from senescing leaves may be a key component of adaptive mechanisms that conserve scarce nutrients. Resorption may be expressed in two ways as resorption efficiency (RE) which is the ratio of the resorbed amounts of nutrient losses during leaf senescence in relation to its prior amount deposited in leaves and resorption proficiency (RP) is the level to which nutrient concentration per unit leaf mass is reduced in senescent leaves.• There is still much deba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the often-cited 50% NR and PR found in the literature (Aerts 1996, Yuan et al 2005, Huang et al 2007, Yuan and Chen 2009a, Kilic et al 2010, we estimate that NR and PR for terrestrial plants in general are 62.1% and 64.9%, respectively (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Mass Loss During Senescencecontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Unlike the often-cited 50% NR and PR found in the literature (Aerts 1996, Yuan et al 2005, Huang et al 2007, Yuan and Chen 2009a, Kilic et al 2010, we estimate that NR and PR for terrestrial plants in general are 62.1% and 64.9%, respectively (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Mass Loss During Senescencecontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…In our study, soil N and P (%) contents generally increased with increasing altitude. Kilic et al (2010) also reported that total N, available P, soil water content, and soil organic matter increased along with the altitudinal gradient. Other researchers found that there were positive correlation coefficients between soil and plant nutrient levels (Powers, 1984;Johnson et al, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The reason for this may be due to the increase in the concentration of N and P in the soil. Kilic et al (2010) reported that resorption was affected by the altitude gradient, and, as a result, resorption efficiency and proficiency altered depending on altitude. Killingbeck (1996) and Vergutz et al (2012) argued that water availability, timing of abscission, leaf nutrient status, or shade could cause the variations between resorption efficiencies.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When these nutrient concentrations vary among sites in inter-or intraspecific comparisons, it has been interpreted as a consequence of soil nutrient availability (Shaver and Melillo 1984; Lajtha and Klein 1988;Vitousek et al 1995;Covelo et al 2008). However, slight variations in foliar nutrient concentrations between Quercus species have been reported when they grow together at the same site (Aponte et al 2011;Covelo et al 2008;Kilic et al 2010;Knops and Koenig 1997;Wu et al 2012). In the case of the species studied here, the N and P concentrations and N/P ratio of green leaves did not differ between the two Quercus species, while P availability varied among soils under these species.…”
Section: Litterfall Quality Is Regulated By the Foliar Nutrient Resormentioning
confidence: 99%