2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the nature and geometry of major fault systems from geophysical and structural analysis: The Palmerville Fault in NE Queensland, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption made in worming is that maxima derived from the higher continuation elevations reflect deeper structure while those from smaller continuation distances relate to shallower sources, but this relationship is not always guaranteed due the nonuniqueness of potential field data [ Archibald et al ., ]. Nonetheless, plotting the “worms” or maxima locations in 3‐D by using the continuation distance as a proxy for depth provides a visual summary of possible geologic surfaces that can be used for structural interpretations [ Bierlein et al ., ; Vos et al ., ]. The color‐coded depth scale in Figure a and the inferred surfaces based on these depth estimates are approximate.…”
Section: Component Data Sets and Underlying Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption made in worming is that maxima derived from the higher continuation elevations reflect deeper structure while those from smaller continuation distances relate to shallower sources, but this relationship is not always guaranteed due the nonuniqueness of potential field data [ Archibald et al ., ]. Nonetheless, plotting the “worms” or maxima locations in 3‐D by using the continuation distance as a proxy for depth provides a visual summary of possible geologic surfaces that can be used for structural interpretations [ Bierlein et al ., ; Vos et al ., ]. The color‐coded depth scale in Figure a and the inferred surfaces based on these depth estimates are approximate.…”
Section: Component Data Sets and Underlying Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interpreted to have a dip which is shallow to the northeast and then flattens out to near subhorizontal, although as mentioned above, Fawckner (1981) and Shaw et al (1987) interpreted it to dip to the west, and suggested thrusting of the Etheridge Province towards the east. based on multiscale wavelet edge analysis combined with forward modelling of magnetic and gravity data, Vos et al (2006a) considered that the Palmerville Fault was a steeply eastward-dipping structure which could become listric at depth. Champion and Bultitude (1994) reached similar conclusions, based on marked changes in both granite geochemistry and their isotope signatures, which occur to the east of the position of the Palmerville Fault.…”
Section: The Tasman Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major structural control in the Mitchell catchment is the southnorth striking, steeply dipping Palmerville fault (Vos et al, 2006), which is considered a reactivated Precambrian structure (see Vos et al, 2006, for review). This fault separates the adjacent Palaeozoic Hodgkinson Province to the east from Proterozoic metamorphic rocks to the west, which are overlain by fl uvial megafan deposits (Figure 3).…”
Section: Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%