Resolving esthetic and phonetic problems associated with maxillary implant-supported prostheses. A clinical report

Graser, Gerald N.; Myers, Michael L.; Iranpour, B

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(89)90162-5

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Information regarding the endocrine and paracrine actions of muscle‐derived exosomes is limited. Exosome‐like vesicles (ELVs) isolated from the quadriceps muscle of insulin‐resistant mice were able to disrupt β cell proliferation in a cell culture model, and GFP‐tagged ELVs injected into the tibialis anterior were found in the lungs, liver, and spleen, suggesting that these vesicles are distributed throughout the body . Further research is needed to define the roles of circulating miRNAs derived from skeletal muscle in homeostasis of cells in bone.…”

Section: Exosomes and Their Micro‐rna Cargosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Muscle–bone interactions: movement in the field of mechano–humoral coupling of muscle and bone

Cardozo

Graham

2017

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyclical, mechanical loading of bone by skeletal muscle is widely recognized as a critical determinant of bone structure and mass. A growing body of evidence indicates that substances released from skeletal muscle into the bloodstream also regulate bone mass and metabolism. In this commentary, we discuss the status of research in the area of humoral regulation of bone mass by the skeletal muscle secretome, with an emphasis on the roles of myostatin, irisin, interleukin-6, and exosomes. The interplay between muscle, bone, and other modulators of bone mass, including circadian rhythm and sympathetic tone, is also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Exosomes and Their Micro‐rna Cargosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Muscle–bone interactions: movement in the field of mechano–humoral coupling of muscle and bone

Cardozo

Graham

2017

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…23). 35 Masking of multi-unit abutments in addition to minimising unwanted air escape during speech can be achieved by using removable indirectly or directly constructed gingival prosthesis (Fig. 24).…”

Section: Management Of Soft Tissue Aesthetics In the Denture Patientmentioning

confidence: 99%

The prosthetic management of gingival aesthetics

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Too much bone in anterior maxillae can have detrimental impacts on maxillary prosthetic design, as OD frameworks are space‐sensitive (Fig 11). For patients with high smile lines and minimal resorption of the alveolar process, the restorative dentist and surgeon may elect not to place implants in the incisal areas to preclude esthetic concerns secondary to abutments placed into embrasures of the prosthesis 48 . If there is sufficient bone in the posterior maxilla, it may be desirable to place implants in the canine and posterior regions to support prostheses without involving the premaxilla (Fig 12).…”

Section: Guidelines For Maxillary Implant Treatment: Diagnosticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…prosthesis. 48 If there is sufficient bone in the posterior maxilla, it may be desirable to place implants in the canine and posterior regions to support prostheses without involving the premaxilla (Fig 12). The implant team may also decide to remove bone to obtain adequate restorative volume for implant prostheses.…”

Section: Maxillary Vertical Resorptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Maxillary Jaws with Dental Implants: Guidelines for Treatment

Drago

Carpentieri²

2011

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillary implant prosthetic treatments may be considerably more difficult to accomplish when compared to the corresponding treatments for patients with edentulous or partially edentulous jaws. The objectives of this article include descriptions of diagnostic records and their impact on treatment success, and criteria clinicians should use to determine whether fixed or removable prostheses are the treatment of choice in any given situation. Specific criteria and clinical guidelines will be identified for use in the treatment planning process. Determination of optimal tooth positions and their relationships to residual ridges or extraction sites are one of the critical factors in determining designs for maxillary implant prostheses. Prosthetic designs (fixed or removable) should be determined by clinicians prior to placing implants; removable prostheses should not be considered to be the "fall-back" treatment option if fixed treatments become unavailable secondary to loss of implants or other clinical complications. Inherent differences between fixed and removable prosthetic treatments are critical for clinicians to understand, as they often include key points for clinicians explaining the features of fixed/removable-implant prostheses to patients. Appreciation of the differences between fixed and removable prostheses is critical for patients and clinicians to make informed decisions.

show abstract

Resolving esthetic and phonetic problems associated with maxillary implant-supported prostheses. A clinical report

Cited by 11 publications

References 3 publications

Muscle–bone interactions: movement in the field of mechano–humoral coupling of muscle and bone

Muscle–bone interactions: movement in the field of mechano–humoral coupling of muscle and bone

The prosthetic management of gingival aesthetics

Treatment of Maxillary Jaws with Dental Implants: Guidelines for Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About