2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732319500615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolvable heavy neutrino–antineutrino oscillations at colliders

Abstract: Heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations can appear in mechanisms of low scale neutrino mass generation, where pairs of heavy neutrinos have almost degenerate masses. We discuss the case where the heavy neutrinos are sufficiently longlived to decay displaced from the primary vertex, such that the oscillations of the heavy neutrinos into antineutrinos can potentially be observed at the (high-luminosity) LHC and at currently planned future collider experiments. The observation of these oscillations would allow t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the mass splitting is smaller than Γ N i , then the destructive interference between contributions from different N i to the diagram in Figure 3 leads to a suppression of processes that violate L [91]. In the intermediate regime where M i − M j ∼ Γ N i , Γ N j there can be non-trivial effects due to coherent oscillations amongst the heavy neutrinos [56,58,87,95,96]. Hence, a precise predicion of the number of events depends on parameters that may not be directly observable if the mass splitting is smaller than the kinematic resolution of the detector.…”
Section: A Type I Seesaw Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mass splitting is smaller than Γ N i , then the destructive interference between contributions from different N i to the diagram in Figure 3 leads to a suppression of processes that violate L [91]. In the intermediate regime where M i − M j ∼ Γ N i , Γ N j there can be non-trivial effects due to coherent oscillations amongst the heavy neutrinos [56,58,87,95,96]. Hence, a precise predicion of the number of events depends on parameters that may not be directly observable if the mass splitting is smaller than the kinematic resolution of the detector.…”
Section: A Type I Seesaw Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed framework then connects the issue of flavour measurements to other open questions within neutrino physics and cosmology, such as the neutrino mass generation mechanism and the dynamics of baryogenesis via leptogenesis, extending the phenomenological reach of flavour experiments. We highlight that RHNs in the considered mass range can be discovered by the planned SHIP experiment at CERN [41], as well as in collider experiments through the implied lepton number violating effects [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the light neutrino masses are introduced via a small breaking of the protective symmetry, this can in principle (depending on the induced small mass splitting of the quasi-degenerate heavy neutrino pair) lead to observable lepton number violation via heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations. For displaced vertices the heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations might even be resolved via an oscillatory lifetime-dependence of Br(N → µ − + 2j)/Br(N → µ + + 2j), as discussed in [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore our results should hold in more generality, unless unless |θ e | |θ µ |, |θ τ |, in which case the lepton flavor conserving signatures become most relevant. While in our model lepton number violation (LNV) is effectively absent for masses of O(100) GeV [8] it is interesting to consider the possibility of the LNV final states at lower masses. The lepton trijet signature with an anti-lepton is also free of background and can be detectable with a significance that is similar to the lepton number conserving lepton trijet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation