2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.055031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common explanation to the RK(*) , RD

Abstract: Scalar theories can account for the current R D ( * ) measurements through a vector operatorc L γ µ b LτL γ µ ν L induced at the loop level. Once the vector contribution is considered on top of a subdominant tree-level scalar component, the predicted value of R D ( * ) falls within the 1σ region indicated by the experiments. We explicitly demonstrate this claim in the framework of a three Higgs doublet model extended with GeV scale right-handed neutrinos, by matching the anomalous signal for perturbative value… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, box contributions of heavy new scalars and fermions 2 (also within multi Higgs doublet models with right-handed neutrinos [75][76][77]) have been shown to be a viable option [78][79][80][81] 3 . Furthermore, an explanation of the anomalies in b → s + − via loop effects allows for interesting connections to Dark Matter [86][87][88][89][90][91][92] and typically leads to correlated imprints on other observables like the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon (a µ ).…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, box contributions of heavy new scalars and fermions 2 (also within multi Higgs doublet models with right-handed neutrinos [75][76][77]) have been shown to be a viable option [78][79][80][81] 3 . Furthermore, an explanation of the anomalies in b → s + − via loop effects allows for interesting connections to Dark Matter [86][87][88][89][90][91][92] and typically leads to correlated imprints on other observables like the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon (a µ ).…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible constructions for the Wilson coefficients of the effective Hamiltonian descending from loops of TeV-scale new particles have been investigated, e.g., in refs. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. They generally involve either box diagrams of scalar and fermionic states like in figure 1(a), or penguin diagrams like the ones represented in figure 1(b).…”
Section: Effective One-loop Wilson Coefficients From Split Dark Sectomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, contributions to other loop-induced processes such as b → sγ (for which the SM prediction [47] is in very well agreement with the experimental average [31]), b → sνν, (where the experimental upper bound [48,49] approaches the SM prediction [50]) or B s −B s mixing [31] unavoidably arise and their constraints must be taken into account. Therefore, an explanation of b → s + − data in the context of multi-Higgs-doublet models might require the introduction of right-handed neutrinos [51,52]. Furthermore, any model with sizeable couplings to muons could potentially address the long-lasting discrepancy between experiment [53] and the SM prediction 2 ∆a µ = a EXP µ − a SM µ ∼ 270(85) × 10 −11 , (1.3) of 3-4 σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%