2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.245403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution enhancement and improved data interpretation in electrostatic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
227
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
227
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometrical factor, given by the function g(D), is a sum of three contributions [220], that of the spherical apex of the tip, that of the conical part, and that of the cantilever:…”
Section: Electrostatic Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical factor, given by the function g(D), is a sum of three contributions [220], that of the spherical apex of the tip, that of the conical part, and that of the cantilever:…”
Section: Electrostatic Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the contact potential difference (V CPD ) between tip and sample proceeded by applying a fixed AC voltage (0.7 V) at 7 kHz to the AFM tip while the sample was held at ground potential. For small amplitudes in the true non-contact regime, and provided that the AC frequency is much smaller than the tip resonance frequency, the shift of the resonance frequency is proportional to the gradient of the electrostatic interaction [32]. A second feedback adjusts the DC bias between tip and sample in order to minimize this interaction and determine V CPD (FM-mode).…”
Section: Electrical Characterization Kpfm and Spvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For z >≈ 5 nm the capacitances to the tip cone and cantilever exceed that to the tip apex. 19 As a result the response to the sensitive point includes a large "nonlocal" part spread over a lateral area comparable with the size of the tip cone (perhaps 10 μm) and the cantilever (perhaps 30 μm by 150 μm). Many samples, such as 2D films, are sensitive at multiple points or over extended areas, and the combination of the nonlocal response from all sensitive regions produces a large and obfuscating background which in most cases cannot be deconvolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%