1974
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.27.7.572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistotyping ofProteus mirabilisand a comparison with other methods of typing

Abstract: SYNOPSIS Resistotyping of P. mirabilis using 10 compounds is reported. The method was tested for reproducibility and specificity and results were compared with those obtained by serological, bacteriophage, and proticine typing methods and the Dienes test. The possible relationship between resistance to the chemicals used in the test and antibiotics was also studied.The method was found to be simple, reproducible, show good specificity, and compare favourably with other typing methods. No linkage between resist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are needed. Several techniques have been described (Tracy and Thomson, 1972;Kashbur, George and Ayliffe, 1974;Schmidt and Jeffries, 1974), but few have come into widespread use. Serotyping of Proteus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are needed. Several techniques have been described (Tracy and Thomson, 1972;Kashbur, George and Ayliffe, 1974;Schmidt and Jeffries, 1974), but few have come into widespread use. Serotyping of Proteus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same 33 isolates had been typed using the Cradock-Watson method on two occasions with identical results, giving nine types with two untypable isolates (George, unpublished results; CPHL, unpublished results). In (Kashbur et al, 1974), and by thX resistogram technique the 33 isolates had been shown to consist of 28 different strains (Kashbur et al, 1974). The Al-Jumaili system demonstrated 18 proteocine sensitive patterns with no untypable isolates (table VII).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An alternative scheme based on the sensitivity of strains to high-titre extracts is being developed by the author, but as yet a panel of extracts which enables differentiation into a large number of strains with few or no untypable strains is not available. The improvement in the present typing method using bacteriocine agar should encourage its more frequent application, but the use of two typing methods is preferable, as it allows a greater proportion of strains to be typed (Kashbur, George, and Ayliffe, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%