2016
DOI: 10.7554/elife.13195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production

Abstract: Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741 commercial cattle as they moved through the process of beef production from feedlot entry through slaughter. We recorded antimicrobial drug exposures and interrogated the resistome at points in production when manag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
117
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
117
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This identified 300 unique AMR genes, and showed that, the diversity of the AMR genes decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicative of selective pressure imposed by antimicrobials, consistent with other studies showing diversity reduction following antimicrobial exposure [163]. Examination of post-slaughter samples obtained from belts and tables in the slaughterhouse, meat trimmings, and market-ready samples revealed no AMR genes [186]. The authors concluded that effective practices at slaughter minimized the likelihood of AMR gene being passed through the food chain.…”
Section: The Bovine Resistome and The Wider Environmentsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This identified 300 unique AMR genes, and showed that, the diversity of the AMR genes decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicative of selective pressure imposed by antimicrobials, consistent with other studies showing diversity reduction following antimicrobial exposure [163]. Examination of post-slaughter samples obtained from belts and tables in the slaughterhouse, meat trimmings, and market-ready samples revealed no AMR genes [186]. The authors concluded that effective practices at slaughter minimized the likelihood of AMR gene being passed through the food chain.…”
Section: The Bovine Resistome and The Wider Environmentsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Noyes et al [186] examined AMR genes of 1,741 beef cattle as they moved longitudinally through the production chain, characterizing feedlot, slaughter, and beef product resistomes via shotgun metagenomics performed on the Illumina HiSeq platform, and assessed against the Resfinder [187], ARG-ANNOT [188], and CARD [185] AMR gene databases. This identified 300 unique AMR genes, and showed that, the diversity of the AMR genes decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicative of selective pressure imposed by antimicrobials, consistent with other studies showing diversity reduction following antimicrobial exposure [163].…”
Section: The Bovine Resistome and The Wider Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems can be partially resolved by parallel culturing of organisms (from the same source as the metagenomics data), selection of specific phenotypes, and determining the genetic context of specific genes in such isolates. However, the majority of organisms found in environmental systems cannot be cultured under standard laboratory conditions, which poses a problem for linking ARB and ARG metagenomics data within environmental compartments …”
Section: Considerations For Amr Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, increasing accessibility to high-throughput quantitative PCR, microarrays, and high throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies have enabled identification of hundreds to thousands of AMR determinants in single genome or metagenomic samples (1113). Metagenomic high-throughput sequencing specifically is currently being explored for expanded use in public health surveillance efforts related to AMR (1,4,9,14–17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%