2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5049335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistivity profiles in multicrystalline silicon ingots featuring gallium co-doping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives rather symmetrical resistivity profiles along 1.3 Ω cm for Ref 1.3 and Comp 1.3 with a crossing resistivity near 60 % of the relative height. Gallium starts being the dominant dopant in the very top part of the ingot which decreases dramatically the resistivity [9]. This is not shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Resistivity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gives rather symmetrical resistivity profiles along 1.3 Ω cm for Ref 1.3 and Comp 1.3 with a crossing resistivity near 60 % of the relative height. Gallium starts being the dominant dopant in the very top part of the ingot which decreases dramatically the resistivity [9]. This is not shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Resistivity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The same amount of gallium is added in all compensated ingots and the boron concentration is varied to obtain the targeted resistivities. The description of the ingots with their initial dopant concentrations in the silicon melt (from Ref [9]) is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a non-compensated ingot with target resistivity of 1.3 Ωcm, made with a blend of Siemens polysilicon and fluidized bed reactor (FBR) silicon, was cast as a reference. The net doping, the resistivity profiles and the compensation levels throughout the ingot heights are shown in Figure 1 based on calculations and fitting to experimental resistivity profiles published in a previous paper [8]. Note that the three ESS ® ingots are named after their target resistivity, and that the actual resistivity is varying along the ingot height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical level of phosphorus in ESS ® is 0.60 ppmw [7]. Due to the different segregation coefficients of different dopant species, a more uniform resistivity profile throughout the height of the multicrystalline ingot can be obtained by adding Ga co-doping in addition to boron (also called tri-doping), enabling a larger degree of optimization of the resistivity towards the final solar cell performance [8]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traces of Ga may arise from the use of a small fraction of compensated silicon in the feedstock. 53 The vibrational lines of these defects were not detected in measurements at RT, most likely due to their low concentrations. Furthermore, the H-B and H-Ga vibrational lines are extremely weak in both the initial and the regenerated states of the nonhydrogenated reference wafers.…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Physicsmentioning
confidence: 98%