2017
DOI: 10.1177/0038038516656992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resisting Piratic Method by Doing Research Otherwise

Abstract: The reconstruction of sociology into connected sociologies works towards a truly global and plural discipline. But if undoing the overrepresentation of European epistemology in sociology requires a deeper engagement with epistemologies of the South or worlds and knowledges otherwise, how can we ensure that such engagements do not simply reproduce colonial forms of appropriation and domination? Here I consider means of resisting extractive, or ‘piratic’ method in sociology research by drawing lessons from recen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper also raises the less explored ethical issues associated with the non-visibility of the complex personhood of groups made 'abject' through stigmatising discourses (Tyler, 2013), since reductive social imaginaries of their circumstances can then remain relatively untroubled by research. At the very least, the experience of the film suggests that there is a need to subject institutional ethical processes to broader, but also contextualized, reflection on research relationships (also see Tilley, 2017) and on the potential effects of such processes on the representation of data, including on public debate. In some contexts, it may be that a relatively 'mute' presentation of objects or of victims, as in some of the photographs of injured Palestinians discussed by Ginsburg, fulfils the purpose of supplying visibility or human rights 'witnessing' where recognition of that oppression may be denied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper also raises the less explored ethical issues associated with the non-visibility of the complex personhood of groups made 'abject' through stigmatising discourses (Tyler, 2013), since reductive social imaginaries of their circumstances can then remain relatively untroubled by research. At the very least, the experience of the film suggests that there is a need to subject institutional ethical processes to broader, but also contextualized, reflection on research relationships (also see Tilley, 2017) and on the potential effects of such processes on the representation of data, including on public debate. In some contexts, it may be that a relatively 'mute' presentation of objects or of victims, as in some of the photographs of injured Palestinians discussed by Ginsburg, fulfils the purpose of supplying visibility or human rights 'witnessing' where recognition of that oppression may be denied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 The commons is somehow seen as a panacea and there is an expectation of the commons as some optimised end point of a better society (even when discussing decolonial processes). 69…”
Section: Openness and The Commonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the Epistemologies of the South project represents a set of propositions articulated to confront coloniality, in the proposal of a method, transgressive sociologies (absences and emergencies), which symbolically expand knowledge and practices and constitute futures supported by real options (Escobar, 2016). The project reflects a post-colonialist thinking and, therefore, its conduct needs to cultivate a "decolonial" sociological imagination (Savransky, 2017), in the perspective of recognizing that there is no cognitive justice without existential justice and this is marked by the constitution of possible futures with preservation of the intellectual heritage of the peoples of the "Global South" (Tilley, 2017).…”
Section: Overcoming Hegemony In the Perspective Of The Southern Epistmentioning
confidence: 99%