2004
DOI: 10.1177/004051750407400314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to Compression Behavior of Alpaca and Wool

Abstract: This study compares the resistance to compression behavior of wool and alpaca fibers. It shows that alpaca fibers have a much lower resistance to compression than wool, and there is little correlation between the resistance to compression and the curvature for alpaca fibers. Yet for wool fibers, the correlation between resistance to compression and curvature is very strong and positive. The differences in fiber curvature and scale profiles of alpaca and wool, together with the test method for resistance to com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current RtC test method is strongly related to fiber crimp and curvature. It is not suitable for lowcurvature fibers such as alpaca, and is not a good softness indicator for fibers of different types with varying diameters [8]. For instance, a very fine fiber with high curvature usually has a much higher RtC value than a much coarser fiber with a low curvature, even though the fine fiber is much softer than the coarser one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current RtC test method is strongly related to fiber crimp and curvature. It is not suitable for lowcurvature fibers such as alpaca, and is not a good softness indicator for fibers of different types with varying diameters [8]. For instance, a very fine fiber with high curvature usually has a much higher RtC value than a much coarser fiber with a low curvature, even though the fine fiber is much softer than the coarser one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressional softness has been discussed in the literature in relation to fiber diameter, FC and fiber length. 15,[17][18][19][20] As given in Table 1, the MFD for the three cashmere samples ranges from 15.33 to 16.23 mm.…”
Section: Effects Of Fiber Diameter Fc and Fiber Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For merino wool, Rc is related to the wool grade, 14 but Rc is not a softness indicator for alpaca fibers. 15 McGregor 7 considered 101 samples from commercial lots collected from different sources around the world. The tendency is for the MFD of cashmere to increase slightly with decreasing Rc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators have been exploring the properties and modifi cation of alpaca wool fi bers for 30 years even sometimes mainly focusing on the development of an anti-shrinkage process for wool-based textiles [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Wool fi bers felt when agitated in water due to having a substantial differential frictional effect (DFE) in cuticle structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%