2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to change in goldfish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
34
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
34
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevin et al, 1990). This result has been replicated with a variety of reinforcers and species ranging from fish to humans (Mace et al, 1990;Cohen, 1996;Harper, 1999;Grimes and Shull, 2001;Ahearn et al, 2003;Igaki and Sakagami, 2004;Shahan and Burke, 2004). Nevin et al (1990) have suggested that such effects of the Pavlovian stimulus-reinforcer relation on the persistence of operant behavior are likely similar to other motivational effects attributed to arousal, a central motivational state, or the incentive-motivational properties of conditioned stimuli (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Nevin et al, 1990). This result has been replicated with a variety of reinforcers and species ranging from fish to humans (Mace et al, 1990;Cohen, 1996;Harper, 1999;Grimes and Shull, 2001;Ahearn et al, 2003;Igaki and Sakagami, 2004;Shahan and Burke, 2004). Nevin et al (1990) have suggested that such effects of the Pavlovian stimulus-reinforcer relation on the persistence of operant behavior are likely similar to other motivational effects attributed to arousal, a central motivational state, or the incentive-motivational properties of conditioned stimuli (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Many studies have shown that resistance to change in a schedule component is directly related to the rate or amount of reinforcement occurring in that component, regardless of whether all reinforcers are contingent on responding. This general result has been obtained with goldfish (Igaki & Sakagami, 2004), rats (e.g., Blackman, 1968; Shahan & Burke, 2004), pigeons (e.g., Nevin, 1974; Nevin, Tota, Torquato, & Shull, 1990), normal children (Tota-Faucette, 1991), children with developmental disabilities (Ahearn et al, 2003; Mace et al, 2010), college students (Cohen, 1996), and adults with mental retardation (Mace et al, 1990). These studies have employed different sorts of responses and reinforcers, and have evaluated resistance to change by presenting various disruptors including response-independent reinforcers between schedule components, pre-session feeding to devalue reinforcers, response-contingent punishment, conditioned suppression, concurrent distraction, and extinction – i.e., withholding all reinforcers (for reviews see Nevin, 1979; Nevin, 1992b; Nevin & Grace, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Log b indicates greater resistance to change on one trial type, independent of variations in the reinforcement ratio. Like the matching law, findings supporting behavioral momentum theory have shown considerable generality across experimental preparations and species, ranging from fish to humans (e.g., Ahearn, Clark, Gardenier, Chung, & Dube, 2003; Harper, 1999; Igaki & Sakagami, 2004; Nevin et al, 1990; Pyszczynski & Shahan, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 87%