Resistance to Canadian mining projects in Mexico: lessons from the lifecycle of the San Xavier Mine in San Luis Potosí

Abstract

This article analyses resistance movements to large-scale mining projects in Mexico, particularly the case of sustained organized resistance to the San Xavier Mine, in the central north state of San Luis Potosí. As one of the first struggles in Mexico against Canadian mining projects after the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the leaders of this movement pioneered strategies of resistance on the legal front and were instrumental in building anti-mining alliances and networks on the national and international levels. Now that the excavation process has finished and the mine is closing down, this article seeks to draw on the case to illustrate the complementarity of three approaches for interpreting resistance to mining: class struggle, ecological distribution conflicts, and the clash of cultural valuations over territorial vocation. The argument is that these approaches are not mutually exclusive; they can be combined to explain the multiple dimensions of specific struggles, whose shifts in emphasis at different moments of the struggle are conditioned by – and condition – the phase of a mine's development. By contextualizing the case study in a broader analysis of social environmental conflicts around mining in Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America, the analysis seeks to illustrate the ways in which the struggle against the San Xavier Mine is representative of broader trends, as well as its peculiarities. On the local level, we find the struggle has more to do with defending conditions of social and cultural reproduction than protecting the means of production that sustain traditional livelihoods. This pertains, not just to a non-contaminated living environment and the availability of clean water for human consumption, but also to the conservation of natural and architectural patrimony with historic and cultural significance.Key words: Mining conflicts, Canadian imperialism, political class formation, ecological distribution, cultural valuations

Huella territorial del hidroextractivismo en México: análisis territorial y genético estructural sobre el conflicto socioambiental por el Proyecto Integral Morelos

“…Ante la ausencia de estudios críticos publicados que pormenoricen el riesgo y la vulnerabilidad socioambiental producidos espacialmente por el pim, es importante mencionar que dicho megaproyecto se reconoce como parte de la devastación ambiental de Morelos (Barreda, s/f), así como de una expresión transfigurada de la lucha de clases (Tetreault, 2019) y de la relación capital-trabajo (Harvey, 2003).…”

The ‘Church of the Poor and the Earth’ in Latin American Mining Conflicts

“…Environmental conflicts, he contends, often involve disputes over incommensurable values, expressed through different valuation languages (Martinez-Alier 2008). 5 This conceptualization inspired various authors to trace the articulation of such divergent valuation languages or discourses in the context of concrete mining conflicts (Svampa 2013a;Duarte-Abadía and Boelens 2016;Tetreault 2019).…”

Dimensiones de la (in)gobernanza territorial en conflictos socioambientales. Un análisis desde la minería en México

“…En este sentido, existe la idea normativa de que las comunidades tienen derecho a contar con información completa y previa para su participación en las decisiones relativas a los territorios e, incluso, que esos derechos van más allá de la participación y se encuentran en el ámbito de la autodeterminación en materia de la gestión y aprovechamiento de los recursos naturales en los territorios (Grueso-Castelblanco, 2009). Además, en ocasiones, el compensar a las comunidades por las afectaciones que las operaciones mineras pueden causar, se da sin considerar como primera aproximación la consulta previa, informada y amplia sobre si las comunidades, en realidad, desean que las operaciones extractivas se lleven a cabo en sus territorios (Tetreault, 2019b). Es decir, la lucha contemporánea de las comunidades, en especial cuando se trata de naciones originarias, no siempre se orienta al alcance de consensos y consultas sobre un tipo de explotación minera, sino que en algunos casos trasciende el ámbito de las operaciones y cuestiona si, en realidad, es dicha explotación el camino a seguir para el desarrollo de la comunidad misma.…”