2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00565.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance of wheat cultivars and breeding lines to septoria tritici blotch caused by isolates of Mycosphaerella graminicola in field trials

Abstract: Isolate-specific resistance of 71 cultivars and breeding lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to septoria tritici blotch was evaluated in six field trials in the Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK between 1995 and 1997. Each plot was inoculated with one of six single-pycnidium isolates of the pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. There were strong interactions between wheat lines and M. graminicola and the line-by-isolate interactions were stable over the six trials. Lines with specific resistance or specific su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
2
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
91
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…From the host's standpoint (cultivar), the interaction with certain isolates in a given geographical area allowed the manifestation of resistance genes specific for those isolates, which were perpetuated through the process of artificial selection aimed at the formation of new cultivars. In agreement with these results, evidences of differential interactions between Septoria tritici isolates and wheat cultivars have been found in Israel, Morocco, United States and England, suggesting that the physiological specialization of the pathogen has occurred (Eyal et al, 1973;King et al, 1983;Saadaoui, 1987;Ahmed et al, 1995;Kema et al, 1996aKema et al, , 1996bBrown et al, 2001).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Experiments 1: Castelar-argentinasupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the host's standpoint (cultivar), the interaction with certain isolates in a given geographical area allowed the manifestation of resistance genes specific for those isolates, which were perpetuated through the process of artificial selection aimed at the formation of new cultivars. In agreement with these results, evidences of differential interactions between Septoria tritici isolates and wheat cultivars have been found in Israel, Morocco, United States and England, suggesting that the physiological specialization of the pathogen has occurred (Eyal et al, 1973;King et al, 1983;Saadaoui, 1987;Ahmed et al, 1995;Kema et al, 1996aKema et al, , 1996bBrown et al, 2001).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Experiments 1: Castelar-argentinasupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The inoculation was made 70 days after plant emergence (DAE), corresponding to the flag leaf phenological stage. The subplots of each cultivar were inoculated with a spore suspension of the corresponding Septoria tritici isolate, using the leaf sprinkling inoculation technique (Dhingra & Sinclair, 1986;Eyal et al, 1987). The inoculum concentration was10 6 -10 8 spores mL -1 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of genotypes and isolates were not replicated equally, so the median polish residual for each genotype-isolate pair was multiplied by the square root of the number of plantlets scored, to ensure that all residuals, with the exception of outliers, were sampled from a single normal distribution (Chartrain et al ., 2004). The statistical significance of the deviation of the median polish residual from a normal distribution was tested by Grubbs' method (Sokal & Rohlf, 1981;Brown et al ., 2001). This part of the analysis was completed using Microsoft excel 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pycnidial coverage on leaf surface was assessed as a measure of the level of infection and/or resistance. Although other scoring methods have been proposed for assessing the disease severity of STB in wheat (McCartney et al 2002;Adhikari et al 2003), the scoring of disease severity based on a visual estimation of the percent leaf area covered by lesions bearing pycnidia still remains as the most common approach (Kema et al 1996a;Brown et al 2001;Chartrain et al 2004). Pycnidial coverage is considered to be more accurate because symptoms cannot be confounded with natural senescence or other pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%