“…Notably, the obtained relevant overall property of the r-Ni 3 S 2 //Zn battery is analogous or even surpasses significant proportion of previously reported aqueous Ni-Zn batteries, for instance, NiO//Zn (318 Wh kg −1 @1.47 kW kg −1 ), 54 Ni 2 P// Zn (318 Wh kg −1 @1.37 kW kg −1 ), 10 Ni 3 S 2 @PANI//Zn (386.7 Wh kg −1 @3.88 kW kg −1 ), 13 NiS 2 /RGO//Zn (357.7 Wh kg −1 @1.721 kW kg −1 ), 15 CC-CF@NiO//CC-CF@Zn (355.7 Wh kg −1 @17.9 kW kg −1 ), 61 NNA@CNH-1//NNA@ Zn (148.54 Wh kg −1 @1.725 kW kg −1 ), 56 NiCo 2 O 4 //Zn (301.3 Wh kg −1 @1.309 kW kg −1 ), 57 Co 3 O 4 //Zn (241 Wh kg −1 @1.506 kW kg −1 ), 62 V 2 O 5 //Zn (230 Wh kg −1 @0.767 kW kg −1 ), 63 and Ni 3 S 2 /C//Zn (356 Wh kg −1 @58.6 kW kg −1 ). 64 The long-term cycling durability is considered as the significant barrier hampering the practical application of the Ni-Zn battery. Here, the repeated continuous charge− discharge measurements of the Ni 3 S 2 //Zn batteries are established to explore the cycling stability with the current density maintained at 2.0 A g −1 , as described in Figure 8b.…”