2018
DOI: 10.5334/labphon.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation

Abstract: In two categorization experiments using phonotactically legal nonce words, we tested Australian English listeners' perception of all vowels in their own accent as well as in four less familiar regional varieties of English which differ in how their vowel realizations diverge from Australian English: London, Yorkshire, Newcastle (UK), and New Zealand. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that amongst the vowel differences described in sociophonetic studies and attested in our stimulus materials, only a small subse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exact nature of these representations requires further exploration, and whilst our results highlight the need for an important role for social context, we would not want to exclude a role for a phonetic-phonological explanation. For example, one could imagine that If listeners' representations develop to be tolerant of variation, at least to some degree, then as well as facilitating perceptual adaptation by making it easier to map phonetic variation to underlying phonological (i.e., abstract) categories (Shaw et al, 2018), they might also facilitate mapping of variation across individual talkers to macrosociological constructs. In developmental terms, this might mean that as children shift from phonetic to phonological processing (Nathan et al, 1998), they may be better able to spot and extract patterns of variation, and map these to social categories based on their developing understanding of their social world.…”
Section: Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact nature of these representations requires further exploration, and whilst our results highlight the need for an important role for social context, we would not want to exclude a role for a phonetic-phonological explanation. For example, one could imagine that If listeners' representations develop to be tolerant of variation, at least to some degree, then as well as facilitating perceptual adaptation by making it easier to map phonetic variation to underlying phonological (i.e., abstract) categories (Shaw et al, 2018), they might also facilitate mapping of variation across individual talkers to macrosociological constructs. In developmental terms, this might mean that as children shift from phonetic to phonological processing (Nathan et al, 1998), they may be better able to spot and extract patterns of variation, and map these to social categories based on their developing understanding of their social world.…”
Section: Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When properties of the phonetic signal do not map directly to features in the listener's attended phonology, they map instead to the nearest phonological category. This mechanism of perceptual assimilation to the nearest phonological category is wellestablished from research on cross-language speech perception (e.g., Best 1995;Faris et al 2016), L2 speech perception (Best & Tyler 2007;Bundgaard-Nielsen et al 2011), bilingual speech perception (Antoniou et al 2012;Antoniou et al 2013), and cross-accent speech perception (Best et al 2015;Best et al 2015;Shaw et al 2018). Here, we observed its effects in bilinguals during dichotic listening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In this paper, we extend Perozzo's proposal to account for cases of perception of L2 accented speech by native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. We argue that the same premises of sound assimilation portrayed in L2 assimilation models can be used to account for the perception of L2-accented speech as well as for the speech perception/assimilation processes of other dialects of the same language, as previously proposed in studies by Shaw et al (2018).…”
Section: Implications For Laboratory Phonologymentioning
confidence: 60%