Resilience, complexity and post‐liberalism

Abstract

Resilience is one of the dominant tropes in contemporary policy, practice and academic debate. This paper situates resilience within historical and contemporary approaches to international intervention, governance and analysis. It contains three related arguments suggesting that resilience reflects and seeks to offer a positive alternative to the loss of modern frameworks. First, it is argued that resilience emerged in international intervention as a response to the limits of liberal internationalism in the 1990s. Second, that resilience has emerged as a post-liberal episteme that reflects and seeks to engage the 'reality' of complex life as an alternative to modernist frameworks of analysis. Today, rather than being seen as a limit, complexity is positively foregrounded under resilience frameworks as an active force that has moved beyond the limitations of modern frameworks. Third, this emergence of resilience as a post-liberal episteme that actively responds to complex life can be usefully explained through reflecting on recent work that engages Foucault's notions of biopower and biopolitics.

Community Recovery Following theDeepwater HorizonOil Spill: Toward a Theory of Cultural Resilience

“…Moreover, the institutional context in which this disaster unfolded, particularly the structure of the response process, also imposed its own set of assumptions regarding the primacy of certain practices and modes of behavior. The spill’s official recovery framework, organized primarily by external actors, may then have differentially disadvantaged this particular community’s ability to respond to the disaster in a resilient manner, a potential outcome that is too often ignored in the resilience literature (Barrios 2014; Pugh 2014; Welsh 2014). …”

Imagining socioecological transformation: An analysis of the Welsh Government’s policy innovations and orientations to the future

“…(Goal 3 of the Well Being of Future Generations Act, Department for Natural Resources of the Welsh Government, 2015 p. 6) Resilience emerges as a key framing in the Welsh Government's approach to the future, as the two extracts above highlight. This is perhaps not surprising: resilience is a notion which has taken off over the past several years and can be found in a whole host of political discourses, practices and academic debates (Pugh, 2014), particularly in relation to climate change and adaptation, in regional right through to global contexts (O'Hare and White, 2013). Resilience theorists use the term to describe a system's capacity to absorb disturbance and undergo transformation (by way of self-organization, learning and adaptation) so that it may retain essentially the same function ( Holling, 1973), or transform into a new system (Walker and Salt, 2006), and accordingly it has become a popular concept amongst many scholars thinking about sustainability transitions (e.g.…”

Investigación Forense de Desastres. Un marco conceptual y guía para la investigación

“…La noción de resiliencia, mientras que es adoptada con entusiasmo por muchos, especialmente en la "comunidad del desarrollo" y rápidamente incorporada al vocabulario del riesgo de desastres, no deja de tener sus muchos detractores y plantea innumerables cuestiones, incluyendo la idea de que es un distractor de la consideración de las causas fundamentales (Pugh 2014; Gaillard 2016; White y O'Hare 2014). La noción de "transformación" expresa, entre otras cosas una creciente sensación de frustración por el fracaso de los esfuerzos actuales y pasados, por separado y colectivamente, para lograr resultados más sólidos en la reducción del riesgo de desastre.…”