Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri‐implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis

Lee, Joseph Cho Yan; Mattheos, Nikos; Nixon, K. C.; Ivanovski, Sašo

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02264.x

Cited by 211 publications

(125 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

108

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This patient had a history of periodontitis and he was under control treatment. Given the similarities between the diseases processes of periodontitis and peri-implantitis, patients with a history of periodontal disease may be more susceptible to peri-implantitis, and this hypothesis has been supported by increasing evidence [32, 33]. In partially edentulous patients, periodontal pathogens may be transmitted by saliva from periodontally compromised teeth to newly placed implants [34].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several implant surface debridement methods have been reported for the treatment of peri-implantitis, however, some of them can damage the implant surface or promote bacterial resistance. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new treatment option for peri-implantitis. The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze implant surface decontamination by means of PDT. Sixty implants were equally distributed (n = 10) into four groups and two subgroups. In group G1 there was no decontamination, while in G2 decontamination was performed with chlorhexidine. G3 (PDT − laser + dye) and G4 (laser, without dye) were divided into two subgroups each; with PDT performed for 3 min in G3a and G4a, and for 5 min in G3b and G4b. After 5 min in contact with methylene blue dye (G3), the implants were irradiated (G3 and G4) with a low-level laser (GaAlAs, 660 nm, 30 mW) for 3 or 5 min (7.2 and 12 J). After the dilutions, culture media were kept in an anaerobic atmosphere for 1 week, and then colony forming units were counted. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between G1 and the other groups, and between G4 in comparison with G2 and G3. Better decontamination was obtained in G2 and G3, with no statistically significant difference between them. The results of this study suggest that photodynamic therapy can be considered an efficient method for reducing bacteria on implant surfaces, whereas laser irradiation without dye was less efficient than PDT.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…27 Patients with residual probing depths and noncompliance to a strict periodontal maintenance program are at risk of developing peri-implant diseases, with a lower 10-year implant survival rate of 92.1% 41 and approximately 3-times greater marginal peri-implant bone loss over time. 41,42 In contrast, patients who adhered to a periodontal maintenance program had a 2.5-times lower risk of periimplantitis. 39 Therefore, the value of good periodontal health before implant placement and after prosthetic installation is paramount to long-term implant success; this can be achieved by stringent periodontal maintenance.…”

Section: Periodontal Statusmentioning

confidence: 90%

Can Periimplantitis Be Treated?

Wang

2015

Dental Clinics of North America

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Specifically, periodontal pathogens can translocate from periodontally involved teeth to peri-implant sulci in partially dentate patients (23,24). These findings highlight the importance of periodontal treatment of residual dentition before placement of osseointegrated dental implants (14,25). However, a recent hypothesis holds that the core microbiota in peri-implantitis and periodontitis exhibits intraindividual variation (26,27).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 64%

Prevalence and risk factors for peri-implant diseases in Japanese adult dental patients

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated the prevalences and risk factors for peri-implant diseases in Japanese adult dental patients attending a follow-up visit at dental hospitals or clinics as part of their maintenance program. This cross-sectional multicenter study enrolled patients with dental implants who attended regular check-ups as part of a periodontal maintenance program during the period from October 2012 through September 2013. Patients with implants with at least 3 years of loading time were included in the study. The condition of peri-implant tissue was examined and classified into the following categories: healthy, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis. Patients were also evaluated for implant risk factors. A total of 267 patients (110 men, 157 women; mean age: 62.5 ± 10.7 years) were analyzed. The prevalence of patient-based peri-implant mucositis was 33.3% (n = 89), and the prevalence of peri-implantitis was 9.7% (n = 26). Poor oral hygiene and a history of periodontitis were strong risk factors for peri-implant disease. The present prevalences were lower than those previously reported. The quality of periodontal therapy before and after implant installation and patient compliance and motivation, as indicated by plaque control level, appear to be important in maintaining peri-implant tissue health.

show abstract

Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri‐implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis

Cited by 211 publications

References 37 publications

Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy

Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy

Can Periimplantitis Be Treated?

Prevalence and risk factors for peri-implant diseases in Japanese adult dental patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About