Residential Demand Response program design: Engineering and economic perspectives

Mathieu, Johanna L.; Häring, Tobias; Ledyard, John O.; Andersson, Göran

doi:10.1109/eem.2013.6607296

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…DSM can provide flexibility required to balance electricity generation and load which is important for variable renewable energy generation [34,36,37], as almost any measure taken on the power generation side has an equivalent demand-side countermeasure [34]. DSM measures can provide balancing both in terms of energy and capacity (power), and response in various time scales.…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Price-based and market participation are more suitable for slow -energy trading‖ DSM [37], while reliability provision via fast DSM may require DLC for fast, predictable and reliable enough response [34,37,51]. Among price-based programs, RTP has the greatest potential to address VRE integration at all time scales longer than 10 min [38].…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, DSM can provide various other benefits to electrical energy systems and markets with renewable energy, such as reducing price spikes and the average spot price [31], shifting market power from generators to consumers [37], replacing or postponing infrastructure expansion [37,39,40], reducing use of costly peak power [37] and reducing transmission and distribution losses [41]. DSM may also facilitate energy efficiency measures [42,43].…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…DSM programs can be classified as price based, including real-time pricing (RTP), critical peak pricing (CPP), and time-of-use pricing (TOU), and incentive-based programs, including direct load control (DLC) and direct participation to energy markets [37,50]. Price-based and market participation are more suitable for slow -energy trading‖ DSM [37], while reliability provision via fast DSM may require DLC for fast, predictable and reliable enough response [34,37,51].…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity

Lund

Lindgren

Mikkola

et al. 2015

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

1,206

578

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Title: Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity Article Type: Review Article Keywords: energy system flexibility; DSM; energy storage; ancillary service; electricity market; smart grid Abstract: The paper reviews different approaches, technologies, and strategies to manage large-scale schemes of variable renewable electricity such as solar and wind power. We consider both supply and demand side measures. In addition to presenting energy system flexibility measures, their importance to renewable electricity is discussed. The flexibility measures available range from traditional ones such as grid extension or pumped hydro storage to more advanced strategies such as demand side management and demand side linked approaches, e.g. the use of electric vehicles for storing excess electricity, but also providing grid support services. Advanced batteries may offer new solutions in the future, though the high costs associated with batteries may restrict their use to smaller scale applications. Different "P2Y"-type of strategies, where P stands for surplus renewable power and Y for the energy form or energy service to which this excess in converted to, e.g. thermal energy, hydrogen, gas or mobility are receiving much attention as potential flexibility solutions, making use of the energy system as a whole. To "functionalize" or to assess the value of the various energy system flexibility measures, these need often be put into an electricity/energy market or utility service context. Summarizing, the outlook for managing large amounts of RE power in terms of options available seems to be promising. AbstractThe paper reviews different approaches, technologies, and strategies to manage large-scale schemes of variable renewable electricity such as solar and wind power. We consider both supply and demand side measures. In addition to presenting energy system flexibility measures, their importance to renewable electricity is discussed. The flexibility measures available range from traditional ones such as grid extension or pumped hydro storage to more advanced strategies such as demand side management and demand side linked approaches, e.g. the use of electric vehicles for storing excess electricity, but also providing grid support services. Advanced batteries may offer new solutions in the future, though the high costs associated with batteries may restrict their use to smaller scale applications. Different -P2Y‖-type of strategies, where P stands for surplus renewable power and Y for the energy form or energy service to which this excess in converted to, e.g. thermal energy, hydrogen, gas or mobility are receiving much attention as potential flexibility solutions, making use of the energy system as a whole. To -functionalize‖ or to assess the value of the various energy system flexibility measures, these need often be put into an electricity/energy market or utility service context. Summarizing, the outlook for managing large amounts of RE power in terms of options avai...

show abstract

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity

Lund

Lindgren

Mikkola

et al. 2015

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

1,206

578

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This holds particularly for thermal-electric loads that exhibit storage properties and non-linear losses, such as those loads used for load shifting. Furthermore, there are concerns that if the price responsivity of loads can be activated, operating large quantities of price-responsive DR could introduce instability into the power system [11], [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Inclusion of Energy-Shifting Demand Response in Production Cost Models: Methodology and a Case Study

O׳Connell¹,

Hale

Doebber

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the context of future power system requirements for additional flexibility, demand response (DR) is an attractive potential resource. Its proponents widely laud its prospective benefits, which include enabling higher penetrations of variable renewable generation at lower cost than alternative storage technologies, and improving economic efficiency. In practice, DR from the commercial and residential sectors is largely an emerging, not a mature, resource, and its actual costs and benefits need to be studied to determine promising combinations of physical DR resource, enabling controls and communications, power system characteristics, regulatory environments, market structures, and business models. The work described in this report focuses on the enablement of such analysis from the production cost modeling perspective. In particular, we contribute a bottom-up methodology for modeling load-shifting DR in production cost models. The resulting model is sufficiently detailed to reflect the physical characteristics and constraints of the underlying flexible load, and includes the possibility of capturing diurnal and seasonal variations in the resource. Nonetheless, the model is of low complexity and thus suitable for inclusion in conventional unit commitment and market clearing algorithms. The ability to simulate DR as an operational resource on a power system over a year facilitates an assessment of its time-varying value to the power system.The modeling methodology is demonstrated through a case study of aggregated supermarket refrigeration systems providing balancing energy reserves in real-time markets at different levels of variable generation (VG). This DR resource is implemented in a test power system that represents a subset of the U.S Western Interconnection centered on Colorado. The value of DR from the population of supermarkets in Colorado is found to be $32.85 per kilowatt-year (kW-yr) presuming no other DR resources. The value decreases significantly (to $6.95/kW-year in the most extreme case) when we increase the capacity of the DR resource to naïvely represent the incorporation of DR from other flexible loads (in actuality, other DR resources will have different characteristics, such that the decrease in value will not be as steep). Refrigeration DR is found to offer greater value to the power system during the winter months than the summer months due to operational constraints that limit the flexibility of the resource during the summer. The value of DR is found to increase as the penetration of VG increases, reaching $46.05/kWyear for our baseline DR penetration and a variable generation (VG) penetration of 55%. We do see a plateau in the value of DR going from 45% to 55% VG. This is attributable to the inability of DR to provide energy storage on horizons longer than 24 hours.Overall, this work is a study in methodology. The case study is included primarily to show that the model is working properly and that this line of research is worthwhile. The reported numbers do not represent a true value o...

show abstract

Active Buildings Demand Response: Provision and Aggregation

Sadeghian

Moradzadeh

Mohammadi‐Ivatloo

et al. 2022

Active Building Energy Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Residential Demand Response program design: Engineering and economic perspectives

Cited by 14 publications

References 20 publications

Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity

Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity

On the Inclusion of Energy-Shifting Demand Response in Production Cost Models: Methodology and a Case Study

Active Buildings Demand Response: Provision and Aggregation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About