Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3242587.3242664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RESi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the sensor might require a flat surface to function (e.g. [22,29]), or the interaction would require a specific textile deformation (e.g. [15]).…”
Section: Standards Laboratory and Real-worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the sensor might require a flat surface to function (e.g. [22,29]), or the interaction would require a specific textile deformation (e.g. [15]).…”
Section: Standards Laboratory and Real-worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in some cases they show that the textile can be deformed (e.g. [22]), it is unclear how much additional work would be needed to identify the interaction from the deformation. The cases hint of fundamental design issues, which inhibit the possibilities provided by textile design.…”
Section: Standards Laboratory and Real-worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the somewhat delicate mechanical layering required for designs inspired by traditional resistive touchpads [10] as well as the relatively fine traces of high resolution devices such as Rosenberg's UnMousePad [27] are currently difficult to implement in fabric. As with conventional sensors, the workarounds include sensor arrays [17,21] that require a relatively large amount of physical connections. Various unconventional solutions, such as the XY textile by Donneaud [14] and a solution that shares many similarities with a 4-wire touchpad by Freed et al [28] have been suggested, but are rarely seen as the relative simplicity of the pressure sensor matrix eventually made it the default design.…”
Section: Etextile Touchpadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the input fidelity of matrix pressure sensors is difficult, as details are often not reported, or design parameters and goals differ greatly. For example, RESi demonstrates a potentially high electrode density [21] and the unMousePad [26] even increases the resolution possible due to high density with physical interpolation. Our design goal is to maximize the sensing resolution independently of electrode density, as this simplifies the physical interface.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation