2016
DOI: 10.1177/2321024915616675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resettlement of Urban Poor in Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Abstract: In Chennai alone, over 21,000 families have already been removed from their primary livelihood area and ghettoised in the peripheral areas of the city like Kannagi Nagar, Semmencherry and Perumbakkam, which are 25 to 30 kilometres from their original habitation. Another 31,912 families are in the process of being removed to these resettlement colonies. The R&R processes adopted by the government for the urban communities have unleashed gross human rights violations including right to adequate housing, food, wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While other authors demonstrate that even though community participation has become a part of the housing policy design in schemes such as basic services to the urban poor, the inadequate local implementation downplays the potential of participatory development (De Geest and De Nys-Ketels, 2019; Patel, 2013). Few researchers have also examined the evolving housing rights discourse in the context of social and political contestations in Mumbai (Weinstein and Ren, 2009) and the absence of human rights-based discourse in India’s housing policies (Diwakar and Peter, 2016). To understand the collaborative housing model, some authors engage with specific case study of the alliance of Society for the Promotion of Area Resource Centers, Mahila Milan and the National Slum Dwellers’ Federation in Mumbai slums (Burra, 2005; Patel et al , 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other authors demonstrate that even though community participation has become a part of the housing policy design in schemes such as basic services to the urban poor, the inadequate local implementation downplays the potential of participatory development (De Geest and De Nys-Ketels, 2019; Patel, 2013). Few researchers have also examined the evolving housing rights discourse in the context of social and political contestations in Mumbai (Weinstein and Ren, 2009) and the absence of human rights-based discourse in India’s housing policies (Diwakar and Peter, 2016). To understand the collaborative housing model, some authors engage with specific case study of the alliance of Society for the Promotion of Area Resource Centers, Mahila Milan and the National Slum Dwellers’ Federation in Mumbai slums (Burra, 2005; Patel et al , 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-led forced eviction 3 of households living along river beds, lakes and in informal settlements in Chennai has affected more than 21,000 households since 2004. Another 31,912 households are in the process of eviction (Dilip & Peter, 2016).…”
Section: Post-disaster Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Approach In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the context of India, Saharan et al (2018) reveal cleavages between slum policies and institutional practices. Similarly, Diwakar and Peter (2016) find a lack of a concise policy for slum settlement, accounting for a knowledge gap between the government and slums. It is common knowledge that the ravages arising from a lack of understanding of government policies can affect the slums' ability to influence policy.…”
Section: Slums' Understanding Of Government Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%