2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-3791(01)00069-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir ages in Baltic Sea sediment—a case study of an isolation sequence from the Litorina Sea stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar variations were found in other Danish fjords [29], with reservoir ages up to 900 years [28]. Other coastal environments show high reservoir ages as well: In a Swedish isostatically isolated basin, reservoir effects as high as R = 1,100 to 700 14 C years were measured on clay gyttja that was deposited during the most saline coastal Litorina phase [96]. On the coast of Oman, a reservoir age of 645±40 14 C years was measured on samples from graves from the 4th millennium BC [97].…”
Section: Sediment Core Samples From the Limfjordsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Similar variations were found in other Danish fjords [29], with reservoir ages up to 900 years [28]. Other coastal environments show high reservoir ages as well: In a Swedish isostatically isolated basin, reservoir effects as high as R = 1,100 to 700 14 C years were measured on clay gyttja that was deposited during the most saline coastal Litorina phase [96]. On the coast of Oman, a reservoir age of 645±40 14 C years was measured on samples from graves from the 4th millennium BC [97].…”
Section: Sediment Core Samples From the Limfjordsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Diatom analyses from Lake Tänavjärv (Saarse et al, 1989) and from Lake Käsmu (Kessel et al, 1986) were made by E. Vishnevskaya several years from an archipelago not far from Stockholm show reservoir ages between 1100 and 400 years (Hedenström & Possnert, 2001), commonly assumed to be in the range of 200 and 400 years (Risberg et al, 2005). The latest studies confirm not only the spatial, but also the temporal difference in the reservoir age since the Litorina Sea (Lougheed et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, our reliance on bulk sediment samples for AMS dating may also be subject to error. For example, Hendenström and Possnert (2001) date paired samples of AMS dated plant macrofossils and bulk sediment samples from an isolation basin in the Baltic Sea. Their work shows that the bulk sediment samples are affected by reservoir ages, and are too old compared with the plant macrofossil ages.…”
Section: Wider Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%