1986
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.1.2.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reserve capacity of the elderly in aging-sensitive tests of fluid intelligence: Replication and extension.

Abstract: Reserve capacity of the elderly in aging-sensitive tests of fluid intelligence : replication and extension first published in:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
141
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
141
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen (1998) noted, for example, that that the intelligence factor,g, predicts only around 65% of the variance in its best predictor, matrix reasoning, leaving another 35% that must be governed by other factors, which could alternatively account for observed transfer (see also Shipstead et al, 2012). Thus, if the aim is to make claims about some latent aspect (i.e., a cognitive process or ability) of the transfer task, and if the ultimate "…goal is not to train for the specific task but to impact the construct underlying the task" (McArdle & Prindle, 2008, p. 703; see also Baltes et al, 1986;Baltes & Lindenberger, 1988), then analyses must be…”
Section: Generality Of Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jensen (1998) noted, for example, that that the intelligence factor,g, predicts only around 65% of the variance in its best predictor, matrix reasoning, leaving another 35% that must be governed by other factors, which could alternatively account for observed transfer (see also Shipstead et al, 2012). Thus, if the aim is to make claims about some latent aspect (i.e., a cognitive process or ability) of the transfer task, and if the ultimate "…goal is not to train for the specific task but to impact the construct underlying the task" (McArdle & Prindle, 2008, p. 703; see also Baltes et al, 1986;Baltes & Lindenberger, 1988), then analyses must be…”
Section: Generality Of Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas most early cognitive training studies (e.g., Baltes et al, 1986) and studies in the field of educational psychology (e.g., Barnett & Ceci, 2002) have used the assessment of transfer effects for the purpose of evaluating the generality of improvements, the recent literature shows a shift toward using the transfer tool as a way to operationally define improvements in processing efficiency (e.g., Karbach & Kray, 2009;Persson & Reuter-Lorenz, 2008). This shift is also reflected in a change in training protocols, from teaching cognitive strategies to repeated practice on tasks tapping theoretically defined processes (e.g., updating, task switching).…”
Section: Improvement Of Cognitive Performance From Cognitive Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It started in 1975 and was conducted jointly by the first author and Sherry L. Willis (BaRes & Willis, 1982). In 1981, Baltes initiated a similar project (Projekt Altersintelligenz = PRO-ALT) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education, Berlin, in collaboration with Freya Dittmann-Kohli and Reinhold Kliegl (Baltes, Dittmann-Kohli & Kliegl, 1986).…”
Section: Precursor Studies and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%