Sixth International Symposium on Quality of Electronic Design (ISQED'05)
DOI: 10.1109/isqed.2005.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reseeding-Based Test Set Embedding with Reduced Test Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…we give the average number of gate area overhead of the two schemes under different L CRP . Table 3 compares the gate area overhead and the test application time of the proposed internal-response-based reseeding method against the previous mixed-mode BIST methods, including the ROM-based reseeding schemes [6,7] and the mapping-logic-based schemes [15,19]. Since the previous work in [6,7] does not report gate area overhead, we estimate their gate area overhead based on the reported controller architectures and the reported number of required ROM bits.…”
Section: Results Of Proposed Reseeding Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…we give the average number of gate area overhead of the two schemes under different L CRP . Table 3 compares the gate area overhead and the test application time of the proposed internal-response-based reseeding method against the previous mixed-mode BIST methods, including the ROM-based reseeding schemes [6,7] and the mapping-logic-based schemes [15,19]. Since the previous work in [6,7] does not report gate area overhead, we estimate their gate area overhead based on the reported controller architectures and the reported number of required ROM bits.…”
Section: Results Of Proposed Reseeding Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 compares the gate area overhead and the test application time of the proposed internal-response-based reseeding method against the previous mixed-mode BIST methods, including the ROM-based reseeding schemes [6,7] and the mapping-logic-based schemes [15,19]. Since the previous work in [6,7] does not report gate area overhead, we estimate their gate area overhead based on the reported controller architectures and the reported number of required ROM bits. In Table 3, we highlight the cases where our methods (L CRP = 100 or 400) uses smaller area overhead or shorter test application time than those in [6,7,15,19].…”
Section: Results Of Proposed Reseeding Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly to the solutions in [8,11], our approach reduces the AF of the CUT compared to conventional scan-based LBIST, by properly modifying the test vectors generated by the LFSR. Our approach is somehow similar to re-seeding techniques (e.g., that in [22]), to the extent that the sequence of test vectors is properly modified in order to fulfill a given requirement that, however, is not to increase FC (as it is usually the case for reseeding), but to reduce PD. The basic idea behind our approach (in its non-scalable version) was introduced in [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%