2020
DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2020.1749838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching Visual Manifestations of Border Spaces and Experiences: Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent years authors have identified the "aesthetic turn" in border studies, particularly with the research of visual representation of borders in photographs, documentary films, videos, as well as maps and other visual objects deployed to visualize the borders (Moze and Spiegel 2022;Kudžmaitė and Pauwels 2020;Boyce 2020;Ellison and Van Isacker 2021). According to Moze and Spiegel, from the perspective of geographical studies, "the aesthetic turn in border studies refers to a variety of empirical, conceptual and methodological interests in prompting attention to how processes of rendering visible/invisible are to be understood" (Moze and Spiegel 2022, 3).…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years authors have identified the "aesthetic turn" in border studies, particularly with the research of visual representation of borders in photographs, documentary films, videos, as well as maps and other visual objects deployed to visualize the borders (Moze and Spiegel 2022;Kudžmaitė and Pauwels 2020;Boyce 2020;Ellison and Van Isacker 2021). According to Moze and Spiegel, from the perspective of geographical studies, "the aesthetic turn in border studies refers to a variety of empirical, conceptual and methodological interests in prompting attention to how processes of rendering visible/invisible are to be understood" (Moze and Spiegel 2022, 3).…”
Section: O N L I N E F I R S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, scholars have seen the potential of visual methods to challenge migrant (Lenette, 2019;Smets & Ahenkona, 2023) and border (in)visibility (Kudžmaitė & Pauwels, 2022) in a collaborative way. In this regard, and following Kudžmaitė and Pauwels (2022), PF can make geopolitical and symbolic borders more visible while eliciting information and comments from the participants about their border-related experiences, encouraging them to produce their own data and find innovative ways to disseminate their knowledge through film. Like digital media production among refugeebackground youth, PF can provide a set of "embodied multimodal literacies" (Michalovich, 2021, p. 30) that communicate across different transnational and local spaces and expand social networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Border scholars have widely turned to Rancière's aesthetic contributions for exploring border representations as well as the broader sensory and axiological dimensions of contemporary borders. This “aesthetic turn” has been generating rich literary research on borders in novels (Schimanski, 2015) and poetry (Paül & Trillo‐Santamaría, 2015), but also probed into visual representations of borders – not only as objects of critical inquiry but also as innovative methods of investigation (Kudžmaitė & Pauwels, 2020). From photos of migration (Boyce, 2020; Ellison & Van Isacker, 2021) to documentary films and beyond, visuality is deeply implicated in shaping hegemonic bordering forces as well as in creating counter‐hegemonic borderscapes and “alternative viewings of the geopolitical” (Holland, 2020, p. 1).…”
Section: Introduction: Performing Borderscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%