The aesthetic turn in border studies: Visual geographies of power, contestation and subversion

Abstract

In recent years, critical border studies have developed sophisticated concepts and methodologies for exploring the multifaceted spatialities, sociologies and temporalities of contemporary borders. In this article, we consider how the “aesthetic turn” that has gained prominence in the scholarship can further inform thinking in border studies. Specifically, we focus on the role of the visual in the construction as well as subversion of borders, suggesting possible avenues for future critical aesthetics‐engaged research on COVID‐19 era border reconfigurations. To do so, we first briefly outline the theoretical evolution of border studies, paying attention to recent conceptualisations of borders as dynamic processes of social and spatial differentiation. We then build on the borderscapes concept to unpack research on border aesthetics, with particular attention to the heterogeneous roles played by visual objects such as maps, photographs and videos in shaping both hegemonic and counter‐hegemonic processes of bordering. Finally, we bring these contributions into discussion with recent insights on the COVID‐19 pandemic, sketching several ways to advance aesthetic concepts and methodologies in academic research on borderscapes that are emerging with, and will likely outlast, the pandemic. We suggest that border studies and affiliated sub‐fields can gain useful insights from attending more explicitly and robustly to dynamic visual geographies of power, contestation and subversion.

Architectural Taste: Shaping Aesthetics, Embracing Multisensory Experiences, and Navigating Cultural Influences

“…In summary, the passage highlights several ways in which architecture can influence and improve taste (Moosmayer dkk., 2020). These mechanisms include education through media and documentaries, interactive models of taste for users, and the establishment of a shared language for discussing architectural preferences (Moze & Spiegel, 2022). By employing these methods, architecture can play a significant role in shaping and refining public and individual tastes in the field.…”

COVID-19, city centre streetscapes, and public health signage

“…As a field-based technique, visual methods are widely used, particularly within the social sciences (Rose 2014, Moze and Spiegel 2022. Cities are frequently the settings for the application of critical visual research methods (Tormey 2013, Yap 2021, the interrogation of the influences and impacts of visual objects and for observers to explore how they themselves look, see and interpret them (Speake 2017a).…”

Images of (in)security: Visualizing borders, migrants and control in Serbia's news media

“…In the recent years authors have identified the "aesthetic turn" in border studies, particularly with the research of visual representation of borders in photographs, documentary films, videos, as well as maps and other visual objects deployed to visualize the borders (Moze and Spiegel 2022;Kudžmaitė and Pauwels 2020;Boyce 2020;Ellison and Van Isacker 2021). According to Moze and Spiegel, from the perspective of geographical studies, "the aesthetic turn in border studies refers to a variety of empirical, conceptual and methodological interests in prompting attention to how processes of rendering visible/invisible are to be understood" (Moze and Spiegel 2022, 3).…”