Researchers' Perspectives on Collective/Community Co-Authorship in Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research

Castleden, Heather; Morgan, Vanessa Sloan; Neimanis, Aelita

doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.23

Cited by 97 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If interest and contributions are consistent with typical publishing expectations, such inclusion is in fact expected (Castleden et al 2010). At minimum, publications can be reviewed by and respectfully acknowledge the contributions of community collaborators.…”

Section: Stage 4: Use and Dissemination Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 88%

“…Instead, communities have often been regarded only as a source of local knowledge for the sake of extraction and integration into research design or resource management. Ultimately, such research outcomes serve the state or researchers rather than local or traditional knowledge holders (Nadasdy 2003, Davidson-Hunt and O'Flaherty 2007, Castleden et al 2010, Bohensky and Maru 2011.…”

Section: Limitations Of Current Approaches To Engaged Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By this we mean respect for the landscapes and resources as integral aspects of a community's experience and knowledge systems; not simply a "study site" or a place to conduct "fieldwork" for scholars, but instead, as part of a complex system to which human communities also belong (Heiltsuk Tribal Council 2001, Castleden et al 2010. This respect can be demonstrated simply through word choice (i.e., academic partners refraining from possessive pronouns and concepts embodied in, for example, "my study area").…”

Section: Foundational Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data-sharing protocols will permit appropriate accessibility and dissemination of information while also respecting ownership or confidentiality (Schnarch 2004, Castleden et al 2010). When information is being synthesized to share with community members (likely in forms and forums different from those intended for scholarly products), it should be crafted to be accessible and informative, as well as conscious of potentially sensitive or confidential material.…”

Section: Stage 4: Use and Dissemination Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research

Adams¹,

Carpenter²,

Housty³

et al. 2014

E&S

121

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Ecological research, especially work related to conservation and resource management, increasingly involves social dimensions. Concurrently, social systems, composed of human communities that have direct cultural connections to local ecology and place, may draw upon environmental research as a component of knowledge. Such research can corroborate local and traditional ecological knowledge and empower its application. Indigenous communities and their interactions with and management of resources in their traditional territories can provide a model of such social-ecological systems. As decision-making agency is shifted increasingly to indigenous governments in Canada, abundant opportunities exist for applied ecological research at the community level. Despite this opportunity, however, current approaches by scholars to community engaged ecological research often lack a coherent framework that fosters a respectful relationship between research teams and communities. Crafted with input from applied scholars and leaders within indigenous communities in coastal British Columbia, we present here reflections on our process of academic-community engagement in three indigenous territories in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Recognizing that contexts differ among communities, we emerge with a generalizable framework to guide future efforts. Such an approach can yield effective research outcomes and emergent, reciprocal benefits such as trust, respect, and capacity among all, which help to maintain enduring relationships. Facing the present challenge of community engagement head-on by collaborative approaches can lead to effective knowledge production toward conservation, resource management, and scholarship.

show abstract

Section: Stage 4: Use and Dissemination Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Limitations Of Current Approaches To Engaged Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Foundational Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stage 4: Use and Dissemination Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research

Adams¹,

Carpenter²,

Housty³

et al. 2014

E&S

121

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such processes have been described as engaged acclimatization, which was documented as crafting relations, learning, immersion, and activism (Grimwood, Doubleday, Ljubicic, Donaldson, & Blangy, 2012). This communication is fundamental within a CPBR approach; however, critical issues about authorship or acknowledgement within community-based research have been inconsistently applied (Castleden, Morgan, & Neimanis, 2010).…”

Section: Community-based Participatory Research (Cbpr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Indigenous Research Methods: A Systematic Review

Drawson

Toombs

Mushquash

2017

iipj

188

197

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indigenous communities and federal funding agencies in Canada have developed policy for ethical research with Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous scholars and communities have begun to expand the body of research regarding their peoples, and novel and innovative methods have begun to appear in the published literature. This review attempts to catalogue the wide array of Indigenous research methods in the peer-reviewed literature and describe commonalities among methods in order to guide researchers and communities in future method development. A total of 64 articles met inclusionary criteria and five themes emerged: General

show abstract

Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research

Cooke

Nguyen

Young

et al. 2021

Ecol Sol and Evidence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1. Authorship should acknowledge and reward those deserving of such credit. Moreover, being an author on a paper also means that one assumes ownership of the content.2. Journals are increasingly requiring author roles to be specified at time of submission using schemes such as the contributor roles taxonomy (CRediT) system, which relies on 14 different roles. Yet, there are many other aspects of research that are not adequately captured by the list of roles, particularly in applied environmental disciplines such as conservation science, environmental science and applied ecology.3. The growing recognition that authorship should reflect contributions that extend beyond the usual data collection, analysis and writing provides the ideal backdrop for rethinking contributions in conservation science. Here we propose a more inclusive approach to authorship that recognizes and values diverse contributions and contributors using an expanded list of CRediT roles.

show abstract

Researchers' Perspectives on Collective/Community Co-Authorship in Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research

Cited by 97 publications

References 19 publications

Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research

Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research

Indigenous Research Methods: A Systematic Review

Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About