Researcher Perceptions of Ethical Guidelines and Codes of Conduct

Giorgini, Vincent; Mecca, Jensen T.; Gibson, Carter; Medeiros, Kelsey E.; Mumford, Michael D.; Connelly, Shane; Devenport, Lynn D.

doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.955607

Cited by 41 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is essentially required to follow good scientific practice guidelines and procedure in scientific research (51). Ethical guidelines have been applied to the overall research process to maintain high ethical standards (51,52). The review was undertaken according to responsible ethical conduct considering transparency and rigour of the research process.…”

Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared decision‐making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis

Park

Cho

2017

Scandinavian Caring Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study provides a theoretical understanding of the concept of shared decision-making in the paediatric field; furthermore, by integrating this concept into paediatric practice, it may help to reduce the gap between theory and practice. The analysis could also provide nursing researchers with insight into paediatric decision-making and establish a foundation to develop future interventions and situation-specific theory for promoting high-quality decision-making in the paediatric field.

show abstract

Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared decision‐making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis

Park

Cho

2017

Scandinavian Caring Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research questions of this type tend to be variations of 'how many is' , 'what is' and 'why is' . The second trend is examining researchers responses on and attitudes towards ethical issues and concepts (Giorgini et al, 2015;Löfström, 2012;Schuurbiers et al, 2009). There is also a genre of publications on whether a certain area or field should create a code of its own (Mwaka, 2017;Rossouw, Zyl, & Pope, 2014), as well as what could be called accompanying literature to published CoCs (Drenth, 2006;Karjalainen, Launis, Pelkonen, & Pietarinen, 2002;Löppönen et al, 1991;Steneck, Anderson, Kleinert, & Mayer, 2015).…”

Section: Relevant Previous Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open science and codes of conduct on research integrity

Laine¹

2018

INF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to examine the conceptual alignment between the ethical principles of research integrity and open science. Research integrity is represented in this study by four general codes of conduct on responsible conduct of research (RCR), three of them international in scope, and one national. A representative list of ethical principles associated with open science is compiled in order to create categories for assessing the content of the codes. According to the analysis, the current understanding of RCR is too focused on traditional publications and the so called FFP definition of research misconduct to fully support open science. The main gaps include recognising citizen science and societal outreach and supporting open collaboration both among the research community and beyond its traditional borders. Updates for both the content of CoCs as well as the processes of creating such guidelines are suggested.

show abstract

“…Ford and Richardson’s (1994) review of literature on ethical decision making showed inconsistent findings regarding the influence of codes of conduct on ethical behavior. This may be explained by the fact that specific organizations and institutions tend to vary widely with regard to the extent to which codes are enforced and the degree to which codes of conduct are considered a part of the organizational culture (Giorgini, Mecca, Gibson, Medeiros, Mumford, Connelly, & Devenport, in press). Additionally, within a field, there is a community of which all members are a part, with the assumption being that people are social beings driven to act in accordance with social norms.…”

Section: Field-specific Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of ethical behavior and ethical decision making is of increasing importance in many fields, and there is a growing literature addressing the issue. However, research examining differences in ethical decision making across fields and levels of experience is limited. In the present study, biases that undermine ethical decision making and compensatory strategies that may aid ethical decision making were identified in a series of interviews with 63 faculty members across six academic fields (e.g. biological sciences, health sciences, social sciences) and three levels of rank (assistant professor, associate professor, and full professor) as well as across gender. The degree to which certain biases and compensatory strategies were used in justifications for responses to ethical situations was compared across fields, level of experience, and gender. Major differences were found across fields for several biases and compensatory strategies, including biases and compensatory strategies related to use of professional field principles and field-specific guidelines. Furthermore, full professors tend to differ greatly from assistant and associate professors on a number of constructs, and there were differences in the consistency with which biases and compensatory strategies were displayed within these various groups. Implications of these findings for ethics training and future research are discussed.

show abstract

Researcher Perceptions of Ethical Guidelines and Codes of Conduct

Cited by 41 publications

References 29 publications

Shared decision‐making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis

Shared decision‐making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis

Open science and codes of conduct on research integrity

Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About